Literature DB >> 11420901

A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures.

J C Devine1, S N Rogers, D McNally, J S Brown, E D Vaughan.   

Abstract

Good access to the site of oral cancer is essential to allow for adequate three-dimensional resection of the tumour. Splitting the lower lip in conjunction with a mandibulotomy offers excellent access to all areas of the mouth and pharynx, but this inevitably produces a facial scar and there is morbidity associated with the healing of the mandibulotomy. An alternative approach is the mandibular lingual releasing technique, which provides good access to the oral cavity and avoids the morbidity associated with lip-split mandibulotomy. The aim of this study was to compare aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes between the two access procedures. One hundred and fifty patients had oral access procedures between 1992-95 (ninety lip-split mandibulotomy and sixty mandibular lingual release). Thirty patients fulfilled selection criteria (primary surgery as treatment, tumour size < 5.1 cm, anterior oral cavity tumours, and reconstructed with a radial forearm free flap) and 10 patients from each group were able to attend a review appointment for objective clinical assessment of their speech, tongue mobility, lip competence and temperomandibular signs. Using items from the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire patient subjective outcomes were assessed. Using standardised photographs the clinician and lay persons assessed the overall post-operative facial appearance. The patients also assessed their own facial appearance using a similar scoring method. Resection margins were similar in both groups and it would seem that both methods provide adequate access to the anterior oral cavity. Clinical examination showed no differences in function between the two access procedures. Although there was a small number, the lip-split mandibulotomy group reported significantly better speech, swallowing and chewing. Previous concerns about a possible detrimental effect on appearance following lip-split, were not borne out in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420901     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  13 in total

Review 1.  Advances in quality of life research among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Allen C Sherman; Stephanie Simonton
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Smoking affects quality of life in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Gertrud Krüskemper; Jörg Handschel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Jae-Keun Cho; Bon Seok Koo; Minsu Kwon; Seong Keun Kwon; Soon Young Kwon; Min-Su Kim; Jeong Kyu Kim; Heejin Kim; Innchul Nam; Jong-Lyel Roh; Young Min Park; Il-Seok Park; Jung Je Park; Sung-Chan Shin; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Seongjun Won; Chang Hwan Ryu; Tae Mi Yoon; Giljoon Lee; Doh Young Lee; Myung-Chul Lee; Joon Kyoo Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Jae-Yol Lim; Jae Won Chang; Jeon Yeob Jang; Man Ki Chung; Yuh-Seok Jung; Jae-Gu Cho; Yoon Seok Choi; Jeong-Seok Choi; Guk Haeng Lee; Phil-Sang Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

4. 

Authors:  M Jungehülsing; O Guntinas-Lichius; J P Klussmann; U Schröder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Modified visor approach applied to total or subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction: avoidance of lip splitting and mandibulotomy and cutting off mental nerve.

Authors:  Wenlu Li; Ruiwu Li; Jawad Safdar; Shaohui Huang; Zhongfei Xu; Xuexin Tan; Changfu Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-13

6.  Long-Term Surgical Complications in the Oral Cancer Patient: a Comprehensive Review. Part II.

Authors:  Antonia Kolokythas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-10-01

7.  Transoral laser resection versus lip-split mandibulotomy in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a case match study.

Authors:  C E Williams; A J Kinshuck; S G Derbyshire; N Upile; S Tandon; N J Roland; S R Jackson; J Rodrigues; D J Husband; J L Lancaster; T M Jones
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Compartmental surgery in tongue tumours: description of a new surgical technique.

Authors:  L Calabrese; G Giugliano; R Bruschini; M Ansarin; V Navach; E Grosso; B Gibelli; A Ostuni; F Chiesa
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Outcome Evaluation of Mandibular Pull-Through Approach for Glossectomies.

Authors:  Elroy Saldanha; Sanjay M Desai; Dhruv G Patel; Vinod Dhakad; Bonny Joseph; Sandeep Ghosh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-19

10.  Current management of advanced resectable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas J Ow; Jeffrey N Myers
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.