Literature DB >> 23644937

Transoral laser resection versus lip-split mandibulotomy in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a case match study.

C E Williams1, A J Kinshuck, S G Derbyshire, N Upile, S Tandon, N J Roland, S R Jackson, J Rodrigues, D J Husband, J L Lancaster, T M Jones.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) with lip-split mandibulotomy (LSM) and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction, for the resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCOP). This study is designed as a case-control study matching 24 patients treated with TLM for SCCOP with those treated with LSM. Patients were matched by age (in 5-year epochs), sex, TNM stage, tumour sub site and type of neck dissection. Each group comprised 20 males and 4 females (mean age 56 years). Seven patients treated with TLM had an elective tracheostomy compared with all patients undergoing LSM. Moreover, the time for decanulation was reduced in patients undergoing tracheostomy for TLM. Although similar rates of patients were able to swallow to some degree on discharge, 29% of patients having LSM were discharged requiring enterostomy feeding compared with 4% of patients treated using TLM. Of those able to swallow on discharge, patients who had TLM resumed swallowing in half the time taken for those having LSM. Moreover, those treated with TLM remained in hospital for half the length of time than those treated with LSM. Due to these factors, overall cost for TLM is reduced in comparison with LSM. In comparison with LSM, TLM for the treatment of SCCOP results in fewer tracheostomies and shorter time to decanulation; a quicker recovery of swallowing function and a reduced length of hospital stay. As a result of this, treatment with TLM is on average cheaper. These factors should be considered when deciding on the surgical treatment of a patient with SCCOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644937     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2501-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means?

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; Shaun C Desai; Harry Quon
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Functional and aesthetic results of various lip-splitting incisions: A clinical analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  A D Rapidis; S Valsamis; D A Anterriotis; C A Skouteris
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Oropharyngeal cancer: a case for single modality treatment with transoral laser microsurgery.

Authors:  David G Grant; Michael L Hinni; John R Salassa; William C Perry; Richard E Hayden; John D Casler
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-12

5.  Transoral resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue.

Authors:  Douglas K Henstrom; Eric J Moore; Kerry D Olsen; Jan L Kasperbauer; Michaela E McGree
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-12

Review 6.  Epidemiology and prevention of oral cancer.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; A Tavani; S Franceschi; F Levi; G Corrao; E Negri
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501).

Authors:  Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper; T F Pajak; M van Glabbeke; J Bourhis; Arlene Forastiere; Esat Mahmut Ozsahin; John R Jacobs; J Jassem; Kie-Kian Ang; J L Lefèbvre
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures.

Authors:  J C Devine; S N Rogers; D McNally; J S Brown; E D Vaughan
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Aimee R Kreimer; Raphael Viscidi; Michael Pawlita; Carole Fakhry; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing.

Authors:  F M McConnel; B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; L Colangelo; D Shedd; W Carroll; J Lewin; J Johnson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-06
View more
  12 in total

1.  Improving target localization during trans-oral surgery with use of intraoperative imaging.

Authors:  Peter W Kahng; Xiaotian Wu; Nithya P Ramesh; David A Pastel; Ryan J Halter; Joseph A Paydarfar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Early Oropharyngeal Tumors: a Never-Ending Debate.

Authors:  Yan Monnier; Christian Simon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-09

3.  Initial experience with image-guided surgical navigation in transoral surgery.

Authors:  Joseph A Paydarfar; Xiaotian Wu; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Morbidity and Mortality Following Transoral Robotic Surgery, a Prospective Single Centre Study.

Authors:  S Kumar; B Mettias; D Laugharne; S Mortimore
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 5.  The Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan Sload; Natalie Silver; Basit Abjul Jawad; Neil D Gross
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Health related quality of life following the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer by transoral laser.

Authors:  S N Rogers; R S Pinto; J Lancaster; F Bekiroglu; D Lowe; S Tandon; T M Jones
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Pathology-based staging for HPV-positive squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Authors:  B H Haughey; P Sinha; D Kallogjeri; R L Goldberg; J S Lewis; J F Piccirillo; R S Jackson; E J Moore; M Brandwein-Gensler; S J Magnuson; W R Carroll; T M Jones; M D Wilkie; A Lau; N S Upile; Jon Sheard; J Lancaster; S Tandon; M Robinson; D Husband; I Ganly; J P Shah; D M Brizel; B O'Sullivan; J A Ridge; W M Lydiatt
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Transoral laser microsurgery for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: the Dalhousie University experience.

Authors:  Jonathan C Melong; Matthew H Rigby; Martin Bullock; Robert D Hart; Jonathan R B Trites; S Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  Genomic Copy Number Variations Characterize the Prognosis of Both P16-Positive and P16-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Curative Resection.

Authors:  Arang Rhie; Weon Seo Park; Moon Kyung Choi; Ji-Hyun Kim; Junsun Ryu; Chang Hwan Ryu; Jong-Il Kim; Yuh-Seog Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Tumor phantom for training and research in transoral surgery.

Authors:  Michael Sramek; Yuan Shi; Erick Quintanilla; Xiaotian Wu; Aravind Ponukumati; David Pastel; Ryan Halter; Joseph Paydarfar
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.