Antonia Kolokythas1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Surgery remains the preferred treatment for the majority of oral cancers. The aim of the present article was to provide a comprehensive review of complications associated with surgical treatment of oral cancer including hardware failure; complications associated with choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues that impact on the quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The available English language literature relevant to complications associated with surgical treatment of oral cancer was reviewed. Complications associated with potential for disfigurement, choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues that impact on the quality of life are summarized. RESULTS: In total 35 literature sources were obtained and reviewed. The topics covered in the second part of this review series include hardware failure, scars and fistula formation; complications associated with choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer resection should be planned around two very important concepts. First and foremost is the eradication of disease. This should be the ultimate goal of the ablative team and all potential complications that may be the result of appropriately executed oncologic resection should be discussed in details with the patient. Adequate reconstruction of the defects with restoration of form and function is the second, but not of less importance, goal for the successful care of the head and neck cancer patient.
OBJECTIVES: Surgery remains the preferred treatment for the majority of oral cancers. The aim of the present article was to provide a comprehensive review of complications associated with surgical treatment of oral cancer including hardware failure; complications associated with choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues that impact on the quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The available English language literature relevant to complications associated with surgical treatment of oral cancer was reviewed. Complications associated with potential for disfigurement, choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues that impact on the quality of life are summarized. RESULTS: In total 35 literature sources were obtained and reviewed. The topics covered in the second part of this review series include hardware failure, scars and fistula formation; complications associated with choice of reconstruction, donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic issues. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer resection should be planned around two very important concepts. First and foremost is the eradication of disease. This should be the ultimate goal of the ablative team and all potential complications that may be the result of appropriately executed oncologic resection should be discussed in details with the patient. Adequate reconstruction of the defects with restoration of form and function is the second, but not of less importance, goal for the successful care of the head and neck cancerpatient.
Authors: Leah M Pyter; Yasmin Husain; Humberto Calero; Daniel B McKim; Hsin-Yun Lin; Jonathan P Godbout; John F Sheridan; Christopher G Engeland; Phillip T Marucha Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andreas Fuchs; Stefan Hartmann; Karen Ernestus; Grit Mutzbauer; Christian Linz; Roman C Brands; Alexander C Kübler; Urs D A Müller-Richter Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2016-09-29