Literature DB >> 11420757

Web survey design and administration.

M P Couper1.   

Abstract

Many claims are being made about the advantages of conducting surveys on the Web. However, there has been little research on the effects of format or design on the levels of unit and item response or on data quality. In a study conducted at the University of Michigan, a number of experiments were added to a survey of the student population to assess the impact of design features on resulting data quality. A sample of 1,602 students was sent an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey on attitudes toward affirmative action. Three experiments on design approaches were added to the survey application. One experiment varied whether respondents were reminded of their progress through the instrument. In a second experiment, one version presented several related items on one screen, while the other version presented one question per screen. In a third experiment, for one series of questions a random half of the sample clicked radio buttons to indicate their answers, while the other half entered a numeric response in a box. This article discusses the overall implementation and outcome of the survey, and it describes the results of the imbedded design experiments.

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420757     DOI: 10.1086/322199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  32 in total

1.  Using client-side event logging and path tracing to assess and improve the quality of web-based surveys.

Authors:  Thomas M White; Michael J Hauan
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects.

Authors:  Bärbel Tress; Gunther Tress; Gary Fry
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Demands on web survey tools for epidemiological research.

Authors:  Olle Bälter; Katarina Augustsson Bälter
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe; Alison Diez; Carol J Boyd; Toben F Nelson; Elissa R Weitzman
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The impact of progress indicators on task completion.

Authors:  Frederick G Conrad; Mick P Couper; Roger Tourangeau; Andy Peytchev
Journal:  Interact Comput       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.174

7.  The new Medical Library Association research agenda: final results from a three-phase Delphi study.

Authors:  Jonathan D Eldredge; Marie T Ascher; Heather N Holmes; Martha R Harris
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2012-07

8.  Designing Input Fields for Non-Narrative Open-Ended Responses in Web Surveys.

Authors:  Mick P Couper; Courtney Kennedy; Frederick G Conrad; Roger Tourangeau
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.920

9.  Canadian return-for-service bursary programs for medical trainees.

Authors:  Shelley-May Neufeld; Maria Mathews
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-05

10.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.