Literature DB >> 16206019

Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects.

Bärbel Tress1, Gunther Tress, Gary Fry.   

Abstract

Integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) landscape research projects are becoming increasingly common. As a result, researchers are spending a larger proportion of their professional careers doing integrative work, participating in shifting interdisciplinary teams, and cooperating directly with non-academic participants. Despite the growing importance of integrative research, few studies have investigated researchers' experiences in these projects. How do researchers perceive the outcomes of integrative projects, or career effects? Do they view the projects generally as successes or failures? This study analyses researchers' experiences in integrative landscape studies and investigates what factors shape these experiences. The data stems from 19 semi-structured qualitative interviews and a Web-based survey among 207 participants in integrative landscape research projects. It finds that researchers experience participation in integrative projects as positive, in particular discussions among participants, networking, teamwork, and gaining new insights and skills. Furthermore, most researchers perceive the projects as successful and as having a positive effect on their careers. Less positive aspects of integration relate to publications and merit points. Factors found to contribute to positive experiences include reaching a high degree of integration amongst the involved disciplines, common definitions of integrative research concepts, and projects that include a large share of fundamental research as well as projects with many project outcomes. Based on these findings, we advise future projects to plan for integration, facilitate discussions, and reach agreement on integrative concepts. We suggest that aspects of fundamental research be included in integrative projects. We also suggest that planning be done at an early stage for peer-reviewed publications, to ensure that participants gain merit points from their participation in integrative research efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16206019     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  12 in total

1.  Pushing the frontiers of interdisciplinary research: an idea whose time has come.

Authors:  D Gershon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Integrated Resource Management: Moving from Rhetoric to Practice in Australian Agriculture.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.

Authors:  M Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

4.  Laying a firm foundation for interdisciplinary research endeavours.

Authors:  D Gershon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural Midwest.

Authors:  Kelly M Frothingham; Bruce L Rhoads; Edwin E Herricks
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Web survey design and administration.

Authors:  M P Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2001

7.  Integrating social preference in GIS-aided planning for forestry and conservation activities: a case study from rural SE Asia.

Authors:  Edward L Webb
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Communication in ecosystem management: a case study of cross-disciplinary integration in the assessment phase of the interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project.

Authors:  Christine Haugaard Jakobsen; William J McLaughlin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  When social workers and physicians collaborate: positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences.

Authors:  J S Abramson; T Mizrahi
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  1996-05

10.  Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

Authors:  Victor B Serveiss; Jennifer L Bowen; David Dow; Ivan Valiela
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.266

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bridging disciplines, knowledge systems and cultures in pest management.

Authors:  Will Allen; Shaun Ogilvie; Helen Blackie; Des Smith; Shona Sam; James Doherty; Don McKenzie; James Ataria; Lee Shapiro; Jamie MacKay; Elaine Murphy; Chris Jacobson; Charles Eason
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Group Development and Integration in a Cross-Disciplinary and Intercultural Research Team.

Authors:  Naomi Kirk-Lawlor; Shorna Allred
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Jon Nicholl; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Global health research case studies: lessons from partnerships addressing health inequities.

Authors:  Zoë Boutilier; Ibrahim Daibes; Erica Di Ruggiero
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2011-11-08

5.  Interdisciplinary optimism? Sentiment analysis of Twitter data.

Authors:  Charlotte Teresa Weber; Shaheen Syed
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.