Literature DB >> 20676386

The impact of progress indicators on task completion.

Frederick G Conrad1, Mick P Couper, Roger Tourangeau, Andy Peytchev.   

Abstract

A near ubiquitous feature of user interfaces is feedback on task completion or progress indicators such as the graphical bar that grows as more of the task is completed. The presumed benefit is that users will be more likely to complete the task if they see they are making progress but it is also possible that feedback indicating slow progress may sometimes discourage users from completing the task. This paper describes two experiments that evaluate the impact of progress indicators on the completion of on-line questionnaires. In the first experiment, progress was displayed at different speeds throughout the questionnaire. If the early feedback indicated slow progress, abandonment rates were higher and users' subjective experience more negative than if the early feedback indicated faster progress. In the second experiment, intermittent feedback seemed to minimize the costs of discouraging feedback while preserving the benefits of encouraging feedback. Overall, the results suggest that when progress seems to outpace users' expectations, feedback can improve their experience though not necessarily their completion rates; when progress seems to lag behind what users expect, feedback degrades their experience and lowers completion rates.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676386      PMCID: PMC2910434          DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Comput        ISSN: 0953-5438            Impact factor:   1.174


  5 in total

1.  Web survey design and administration.

Authors:  M P Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2001

2.  You're having fun when time flies: the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression.

Authors:  Aaron M Sackett; Tom Meyvis; Leif D Nelson; Benjamin A Converse; Anna L Sackett
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-30

3.  Duration estimates and users' preferences in human-computer interaction.

Authors:  J Meyer; D Shinar; Y Bitan; D Leiser
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Time estimation and expectancies.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Design of Grids in Web Surveys.

Authors:  Mick P Couper; Roger Tourangeau; Frederick G Conrad; Chan Zhang
Journal:  Soc Sci Comput Rev       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.578

2.  Mobile PHRs compliance with Android and iOS usability guidelines.

Authors:  Belén Cruz Zapata; Antonio Hernández Niñirola; Ali Idri; José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  StudyU: A Platform for Designing and Conducting Innovative Digital N-of-1 Trials.

Authors:  Stefan Konigorski; Sarah Wernicke; Tamara Slosarek; Alexander M Zenner; Nils Strelow; Darius F Ruether; Florian Henschel; Manisha Manaswini; Fabian Pottbäcker; Jonathan A Edelman; Babajide Owoyele; Matteo Danieletto; Eddye Golden; Micol Zweig; Girish N Nadkarni; Erwin Böttinger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 7.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.