Literature DB >> 11398691

Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients.

J Esparza1, M A Boivin, M F Hartshorne, H Levy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in aspiration rates between gastrically and transpylorically fed patients in the intensive care unit.
DESIGN: A prospective controlled study of critically ill patients randomized to receive either a gastrically placed feeding tube or a transpylorically placed feeding tube.
SETTING: University teaching hospital's medical intensive care unit. The study was conducted over 14 months. PATIENTS: Fifty-four critically ill subjects (with an overall 40% mortality) with similar baseline age, severity of illness, and nutritional needs requiring enteral nutrition, with 51 completing the study.
INTERVENTIONS: All feeds were tagged with technetium-99m radiolabeled sulfur colloid, and the pulmonary secretions or lungs of each patient were scanned on a daily basis to determine whether aspiration had occurred. Patients were fed according to their assigned tube placement which was verified daily by continuous electromyography. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Of 27 gastrically fed patients 2 (7%) had evidence of scanned feed in pulmonary secretions or the lung, compared to 3 of 24 (13%) transpylorically fed patients (n.s.). Clinical suspicion of aspiration was insensitive and detected only 60% of isotopically documented aspirations with a positive predictive value of 27%.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in aspiration rates between gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11398691     DOI: 10.1007/s001340100880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  17 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Geoffrey J Dobb; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study.

Authors:  J C Montejo; E Miñambres; L Bordejé; A Mesejo; J Acosta; A Heras; M Ferré; F Fernandez-Ortega; C I Vaquerizo; R Manzanedo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol.

Authors:  Norma A Metheny; Jami Davis-Jackson; Barbara J Stewart
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Adequacy of early enteral nutrition in adult patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hyunjung Kim; Nancy A Stotts; Erika S Froelicher; Marguerite M Engler; Carol Porter; Heejeong Kwak
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 6.  Acute pancreatitis: practical considerations in nutrition support.

Authors:  Leah Gramlich; And Kendall Taft
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-08

Review 7.  Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: relationship to tolerance, pneumonia risk, and successful delivery of enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Andrew Ukleja; Md Sanchez-Fermin
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Risk of aspiration in patients on enteral nutrition: frequency, relevance, relation to pneumonia, risk factors, and strategies for risk reduction.

Authors:  Barry A Mizock
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-08

Review 9.  A guide to enteral access procedures and enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hayden White; Kellie Sosnowski; Khoa Tran; Annelli Reeves; Mark Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.