Literature DB >> 17883984

Risk of aspiration in patients on enteral nutrition: frequency, relevance, relation to pneumonia, risk factors, and strategies for risk reduction.

Barry A Mizock1.   

Abstract

Upper digestive feeding intolerance, as evidenced by high gastric residual volume and vomiting, is the most common complication among hospitalized patients receiving enteral nutrition. These patients are at high risk of developing aspiration pneumonia, which in turn is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. Most episodes of aspiration are small in volume and do not lead to pneumonia. The likelihood of pneumonia increases with multiple aspirations. Pneumonia is also more common in critically ill patients who have bacterial colonization of the oropharynx. Gastric residual volume is commonly used as a means to assess aspiration risk during tube feeding. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this measurement has limited sensitivity. The approach to minimizing the frequency of aspiration during tube feeding involves assessment of the patient's degree of risk and initiation of appropriate measures directed at risk reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17883984     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-007-0039-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  47 in total

Review 1.  Aspiration-related illnesses: definitions and diagnosis.

Authors:  Gary P Zaloga
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Enteral naloxone reduces gastric tube reflux and frequency of pneumonia in critical care patients during opioid analgesia.

Authors:  Winfried Meissner; Barbara Dohrn; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The effect of acidified enteral feeds on gastric colonization in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

Authors:  D K Heyland; D J Cook; P S Schoenfeld; A Frietag; J Varon; G Wood
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Effect of nasogastric tube size on gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients.

Authors:  M Ferrer; T T Bauer; A Torres; C Hernández; C Piera
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Risk of pulmonary aspiration among patients receiving enteral nutrition support.

Authors:  H Mullan; R A Roubenoff; R Roubenoff
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care.

Authors:  K G Kreymann; M M Berger; N E P Deutz; M Hiesmayr; P Jolliet; G Kazandjiev; G Nitenberg; G van den Berghe; J Wernerman; C Ebner; W Hartl; C Heymann; C Spies
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.324

7.  Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications.

Authors:  H Mentec; H Dupont; M Bocchetti; P Cani; F Ponche; G Bleichner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Does the size of nasogastric tubes affect gastroesophageal reflux in children?

Authors:  N Noviski; Y B Yehuda; F Serour; A Gorenstein; A Mandelberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Feeding via nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A comparison.

Authors:  C Baeten; J Hoefnagels
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1992

Review 10.  Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Gary P Zaloga
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  6 in total

1.  Safety of minimizing preoperative starvation in critically ill and intubated trauma patients.

Authors:  Brodie A Parent; Samuel P Mandell; Ronald V Maier; Joseph Minei; Jason Sperry; Ernest E Moore; Grant E O'Keefe
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Upper esophageal sphincter augmentation reduces pharyngeal reflux in nasogastric tube-fed patients.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiao; Ling Mei; Chenyang Liang; Yun Dai; Zhifang Fu; Lihong Wu; Patrick Sanvanson; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Differences in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between liquid and semi-solid nutrient administration.

Authors:  Hirohito Muramatsu; Tetsuro Okamoto; Tomoko Kubo; Midori Matsuki; Sonomi Iwata; Akemi Fujiwara; Naoya Miyajima; Hidetoshi Inomata; Tomokazu Hoshi; Yoshiro Goto
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Factors associated with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia in home health care patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chien-Ju Lin; Yu-Chen Chang; Meng-Ting Tsou; Hsin-Lung Chan; Ying-Ju Chen; Lee-Ching Hwang
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Incidence and risk factors of nasogastric feeding intolerance in moderately-severe to severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jiajia Lin; Cheng Lv; Cuili Wu; He Zhang; Zirui Liu; Lu Ke; Gang Li; Zhihui Tong; Jianfeng Tu; Weiqin Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.847

6.  Gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon intake of a liquid meal with monosodium glutamate in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Hidemi Teramoto; Toshiyasu Shimizu; Hideto Yogo; Yuuta Nishimiya; Shinji Hori; Takashi Kosugi; Shinsuke Nakayama
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-01-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.