Literature DB >> 11394050

Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.

S P Tipper1.   

Abstract

Negative priming has traditionally been viewed as a reflection of an inhibitory mechanism of attention. However, recent accounts have suggested that negative priming does not reflect inhibitory mechanisms. Rather, slowed reaction times on negative priming trials are either due to retrieval of incompatible response tags or of mismatching perceptual information, or due to extra processes needed to distinguish past from present information. In contrast, it is proposed that there is no firm evidence to discount inhibition models. In fact, although retrieval processes can be implicated in negative priming effects, understanding of these requires consideration of the inhibitory processes involved in selecting information for goal-directed behaviour.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394050     DOI: 10.1080/713755969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  121 in total

1.  The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory.

Authors:  S Rajaram; K Srinivas; S Travers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

2.  The effect of asymmetrical association on positive and negative semantic priming.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

3.  Negative priming and stimulus familiarity: what causes opposite results?

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Nagai; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

4.  Fractionating the neural substrate of cognitive control processes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Dreher; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

6.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

7.  On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  James A Grange; Ion Juvina; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

8.  Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Martijn J M Lamers; Ardi Roelofs; Inge M Rabeling-Keus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

9.  Unraveling the sub-processes of selective attention: insights from dynamic modeling and continuous behavior.

Authors:  Simon Frisch; Maja Dshemuchadse; Max Görner; Thomas Goschke; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-02

10.  The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.

Authors:  Malte Möller; Susanne Mayr; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.