Literature DB >> 26233234

The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.

Malte Möller1, Susanne Mayr2, Axel Buchner3.   

Abstract

The spatial negative priming effect denotes slowed-down and sometimes more error-prone responding to a location that previously contained a distractor as compared with a previously unoccupied location. In vision, this effect has been attributed to the inhibition of irrelevant locations, and recently, of their task-assigned responses. Interestingly, auditory versions of the task did not yield evidence for inhibitory processing of task-irrelevant events which might suggest modality-specific distractor processing in vision and audition. Alternatively, the inhibitory processes may differ in how they develop over time. If this were the case, the absence of inhibitory after-effects might be due to an inappropriate timing of successive presentations in previous auditory spatial negative priming tasks. Specifically, the distractor may not yet have been inhibited or inhibition may already have dissipated at the time performance is assessed. The present study was conducted to test these alternatives. Participants indicated the location of a target sound in the presence of a concurrent distractor sound. Performance was assessed between two successive prime-probe presentations. The time between the prime response and the probe sounds (response-stimulus interval, RSI) was systematically varied between three groups (600, 1250, 1900 ms). For all RSI groups, the results showed no evidence for inhibitory distractor processing but conformed to the predictions of the feature mismatching hypothesis. The results support the assumption that auditory distractor processing does not recruit an inhibitory mechanism but involves the integration of spatial and sound identity features into common representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233234     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0685-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  31 in total

1.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The locus of location repetition latency effects.

Authors:  Sarah Guy; Eric Buckolz; Michael Khan
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2006-12

3.  Auditory spatial negative priming: what is remembered of irrelevant sounds and their locations?

Authors:  Susanne Mayr; Malte Möller; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-12

4.  Temporal dynamics of unimodal and multimodal feature binding.

Authors:  Sharon Zmigrod; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Auditory location negative priming: a case of feature mismatch.

Authors:  Susanne Mayr; Robert Hauke; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

6.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J C Brehaut; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The error protection impact of inhibitory after-effects in a location-based task and its preservation with practice.

Authors:  Eric Buckolz; Alexandra Stoddart; Cameron Edgar; Michael Khan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task.

Authors:  B Fletcher; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses.

Authors:  Malte Möller; Susanne Mayr; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Auditory memory can be object based.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Feraz Ishfaq
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.