Literature DB >> 11388918

Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than to metric shape differences.

R Vogels1, I Biederman, M Bar, A Lorincz.   

Abstract

It has long been known that macaque inferior temporal (IT) neurons tend to fire more strongly to some shapes than to others, and that different IT neurons can show markedly different shape preferences. Beyond the discovery that these preferences can be elicited by features of moderate complexity, no general principle of (nonface) object recognition had emerged by which this enormous variation in selectivity could be understood. Psychophysical, as well as computational work, suggests that one such principle is the difference between viewpoint-invariant, nonaccidental (NAP) and view-dependent, metric shape properties (MPs). We measured the responses of single IT neurons to objects differing in either a NAP (namely, a change in a geon) or an MP of a single part, shown at two orientations in depth. The cells were more sensitive to changes in NAPs than in MPs, even though the image variation (as assessed by wavelet-like measures) produced by the former were smaller than the latter. The magnitude of the response modulation from the rotation itself was, on average, similar to that produced by the NAP differences, although the image changes from the rotation were much greater than that produced by NAP differences. Multidimensional scaling of the neural responses indicated a NAP/MP dimension, independent of an orientation dimension. The present results thus demonstrate that a significant portion of the neural code of IT cells represents differences in NAPs rather than MPs. This code may enable immediate recognition of novel objects at new views.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11388918     DOI: 10.1162/08989290152001871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Greet Kayaert; Irving Biederman; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition.

Authors:  William G Hayward; Guomei Zhou; Isabel Gauthier; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.

Authors:  Ada Kritikos; Alexia Pavlis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Avniel S Ghuman; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Neural substrates of view-invariant object recognition developed without experiencing rotations of the objects.

Authors:  Jun-Ya Okamura; Reona Yamaguchi; Kazunari Honda; Gang Wang; Keiji Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Krithika Mohan; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  General recognition theory with individual differences: a new method for examining perceptual and decisional interactions with an application to face perception.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren Vucovich; Robert Musgrave; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

9.  Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Matthew J Hoptman; Antígona Martínez; Sangeeta Nair-Collins; Cristina J Mauro; Moshe Bar; Daniel C Javitt; Pamela D Butler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex.

Authors:  David R Andresen; Joakim Vinberg; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.