PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of myopia in rural and urban schoolchildren in Xiamen, China, and to assess the impact of environmental factors on rates of myopia. METHODS: Second-grade children attending either a city (n=119) or rural (n=91) school in Xiamen, China, were examined using cycloplegic autorefraction and biometry. Detailed questions on socioeconomic status, near-work activity, reading and writing habits, and family histories of myopia were asked in a face-to-face interview using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia was 19.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.3, 29) in the city and 6.6% (95% CI, 2.4, 14.3) in the countryside. The average hours per day children spent reading and writing outside of school was 2.2 hours in the city compared with 1.6 hours in the countryside (P<.0001). In both schools, the odds ratio for total reading and writing, adjusted for parental history of myopia, was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1, 4). CONCLUSION: These data suggest the prevalence of myopia is higher in the city than in the countryside. One possible explanation for these different rates could be that schoolchildren in the city spend more time reading and writing outside of school compared with children in the countryside. Myopic children in both the city and the countryside spent more time reading and writing compared with nonmyopic children. This increased near-work activity may contribute to the prevalence of myopia.
PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of myopia in rural and urban schoolchildren in Xiamen, China, and to assess the impact of environmental factors on rates of myopia. METHODS: Second-grade children attending either a city (n=119) or rural (n=91) school in Xiamen, China, were examined using cycloplegic autorefraction and biometry. Detailed questions on socioeconomic status, near-work activity, reading and writing habits, and family histories of myopia were asked in a face-to-face interview using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia was 19.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.3, 29) in the city and 6.6% (95% CI, 2.4, 14.3) in the countryside. The average hours per day children spent reading and writing outside of school was 2.2 hours in the city compared with 1.6 hours in the countryside (P<.0001). In both schools, the odds ratio for total reading and writing, adjusted for parental history of myopia, was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1, 4). CONCLUSION: These data suggest the prevalence of myopia is higher in the city than in the countryside. One possible explanation for these different rates could be that schoolchildren in the city spend more time reading and writing outside of school compared with children in the countryside. Myopic children in both the city and the countryside spent more time reading and writing compared with nonmyopic children. This increased near-work activity may contribute to the prevalence of myopia.
Authors: Zhong Lin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Yi Cao Zhang; Li Ya Qiao; Yuan Bo Liang; Ning Li Wang; Kenneth J Ciuffreda Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Robert Wojciechowski; Nathan Congdon; Heidi Bowie; Beatriz Munoz; Donna Gilbert; Sheila K West Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lian-Hong Pi; Lin Chen; Qin Liu; Ning Ke; Jing Fang; Shu Zhang; Jun Xiao; Wei-Jiang Ye; Yan Xiong; Hui Shi; Zheng-Qin Yin Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Jon A Peet; Mary-Frances Cotch; Robert Wojciechowski; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yuddha D Sapkota; Bishwa Nath Adhikari; Gopal P Pokharel; Bimal K Poudyal; Leon B Ellwein Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.648