Literature DB >> 16501916

Genomewide scan in Ashkenazi Jewish families demonstrates evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to a QTL on chromosome 1p36.

Robert Wojciechowski1, Chris Moy, Elise Ciner, Grace Ibay, Lauren Reider, Joan E Bailey-Wilson, Dwight Stambolian.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The development of refractive error is mediated by both environmental and genetic factors. We performed regression-based quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage analysis on Ashkenazi Jewish families to identify regions in the genome responsible for ocular refraction. We measured refractive error on individuals in 49 multi-generational American families of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The average family size was 11.1 individuals and was composed of 2.7 generations. Recruitment criteria specified that each family contain at least two myopic members. The mean spherical equivalent refractive error in the sample was -3.46D (SD=3.29) and 87% of individuals were myopic. Microsatellite genotyping with 387 markers was performed on 411 individuals. We performed multipoint regression-based linkage analysis for ocular refraction and a log transformation of the trait using the statistical package Merlin-Regress. Empirical genomewide significance levels were estimated through gene-dropping simulations by generating random genotypes at each of the 387 markers in 200 replicates of our pedigrees. Maximum LOD scores of 9.5 for ocular refraction and 8.7 for log-transformed refraction (LTR) were observed at 49.1 cM on chromosome 1p36 between markers D1S552 and D1S1622. The empirical genomewide significance levels were P=0.065 for ocular refraction and P<0.005 for LTR, providing strong evidence for linkage of refraction to this locus. The inter-marker region containing the peak spans 11 Mb and contains approximately 189 genes.
CONCLUSION: We found genomewide significant evidence for linkage of refractive error to a novel QTL on chromosome 1p36 in an Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501916      PMCID: PMC3123998          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-006-0153-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  52 in total

1.  Genome-wide scan for myopia in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  Dwight Stambolian; Elise B Ciner; Lauren C Reider; Chris Moy; Debra Dana; Robert Owens; Melissa Schlifka; Taura Holmes; Grace Ibay; Joan E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Estimation of pairwise relationships in the presence of genotyping errors.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  K Attebo; R Q Ivers; P Mitchell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Familial high myopia: evidence of an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance and genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Naiglin; J Clayton; C Gazagne; F Dallongeville; F Malecaze; P Calvas
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  1999

5.  Heritability of refractive error and familial aggregation of myopia in an elderly American population.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Nathan Congdon; Heidi Bowie; Beatriz Munoz; Donna Gilbert; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995.

Authors:  L L Lin; Y F Shih; C B Tsai; C J Chen; L A Lee; P T Hung; P K Hou
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  P Mitchell; F Hourihan; J Sandbach; J J Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Missense mutations in the most ancient residues of the PAX6 paired domain underlie a spectrum of human congenital eye malformations.

Authors:  I Hanson; A Churchill; J Love; R Axton; T Moore; M Clarke; F Meire; V van Heyningen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  A second locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 12q.

Authors:  T L Young; S M Ronan; A B Alvear; S C Wildenberg; W S Oetting; L D Atwood; D J Wilkin; R A King
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia.

Authors:  R D Stulting; J D Carr; K P Thompson; G O Waring; W M Wiley; J G Walker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Current gene discovery strategies for ocular conditions.

Authors:  Priya Duggal; Grace Ibay; Alison P Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Genomic profiling in CEPH cell lines distinguishes between the camptothecins and indenoisoquinolines.

Authors:  Venita Gresham Watson; Nicholas E Hardison; Tyndall Harris; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Linkage analysis of quantitative refraction and refractive errors in the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Alison P Klein; Priya Duggal; Kristine E Lee; Ching-Yu Cheng; Ronald Klein; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Barbara E K Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Candidate gene and locus analysis of myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; Margaret E Cooper; Sarah O'Brien; Lisa A Jones; Mary L Marazita; Jeffrey C Murray; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  Identification of a locus for autosomal dominant high myopia on chromosome 5p13.3-p15.1 in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Ma; Shu-Hong Shen; Guo-Wei Zhang; Dong-Sheng Zhao; Chao Xu; Chun-Ming Pan; He Jiang; Zhi-Quan Wang; Huai-Dong Song
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Genomewide scan of ocular refraction in African-American families shows significant linkage to chromosome 7p15.

Authors:  Elise Ciner; Robert Wojciechowski; Grace Ibay; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  The retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) gene is not associated with myopia, hypermetropia, and ocular biometric measures.

Authors:  S Veerappan; M Schäche; K K Pertile; F M A Islam; C Y Chen; P Mitchell; M Dirani; P N Baird
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  AC and AG dinucleotide repeats in the PAX6 P1 promoter are associated with high myopia.

Authors:  Tsz Kin Ng; Ching Yan Lam; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam; Sylvia Wai Yee Chiang; Pancy Oi Sin Tam; Dan Yi Wang; Bao Jian Fan; Gary Hin-Fai Yam; Dorothy Shu Ping Fan; Chi Pui Pang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Fine-mapping of candidate region in Amish and Ashkenazi families confirms linkage of refractive error to a QTL on 1p34-p36.

Authors:  Robert Wojciechowski; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Dwight Stambolian
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  A genome-wide association analysis identified a novel susceptible locus for pathological myopia at 11q24.1.

Authors:  Hideo Nakanishi; Ryo Yamada; Norimoto Gotoh; Hisako Hayashi; Kenji Yamashiro; Noriaki Shimada; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Manabu Mochizuki; Masaaki Saito; Tomohiro Iida; Keitaro Matsuo; Kazuo Tajima; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Fumihiko Matsuda
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.