UNLABELLED: The development of refractive error is mediated by both environmental and genetic factors. We performed regression-based quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage analysis on Ashkenazi Jewish families to identify regions in the genome responsible for ocular refraction. We measured refractive error on individuals in 49 multi-generational American families of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The average family size was 11.1 individuals and was composed of 2.7 generations. Recruitment criteria specified that each family contain at least two myopic members. The mean spherical equivalent refractive error in the sample was -3.46D (SD=3.29) and 87% of individuals were myopic. Microsatellite genotyping with 387 markers was performed on 411 individuals. We performed multipoint regression-based linkage analysis for ocular refraction and a log transformation of the trait using the statistical package Merlin-Regress. Empirical genomewide significance levels were estimated through gene-dropping simulations by generating random genotypes at each of the 387 markers in 200 replicates of our pedigrees. Maximum LOD scores of 9.5 for ocular refraction and 8.7 for log-transformed refraction (LTR) were observed at 49.1 cM on chromosome 1p36 between markers D1S552 and D1S1622. The empirical genomewide significance levels were P=0.065 for ocular refraction and P<0.005 for LTR, providing strong evidence for linkage of refraction to this locus. The inter-marker region containing the peak spans 11 Mb and contains approximately 189 genes. CONCLUSION: We found genomewide significant evidence for linkage of refractive error to a novel QTL on chromosome 1p36 in an Ashkenazi Jewish population.
UNLABELLED: The development of refractive error is mediated by both environmental and genetic factors. We performed regression-based quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage analysis on Ashkenazi Jewish families to identify regions in the genome responsible for ocular refraction. We measured refractive error on individuals in 49 multi-generational American families of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The average family size was 11.1 individuals and was composed of 2.7 generations. Recruitment criteria specified that each family contain at least two myopic members. The mean spherical equivalent refractive error in the sample was -3.46D (SD=3.29) and 87% of individuals were myopic. Microsatellite genotyping with 387 markers was performed on 411 individuals. We performed multipoint regression-based linkage analysis for ocular refraction and a log transformation of the trait using the statistical package Merlin-Regress. Empirical genomewide significance levels were estimated through gene-dropping simulations by generating random genotypes at each of the 387 markers in 200 replicates of our pedigrees. Maximum LOD scores of 9.5 for ocular refraction and 8.7 for log-transformed refraction (LTR) were observed at 49.1 cM on chromosome 1p36 between markers D1S552 and D1S1622. The empirical genomewide significance levels were P=0.065 for ocular refraction and P<0.005 for LTR, providing strong evidence for linkage of refraction to this locus. The inter-marker region containing the peak spans 11 Mb and contains approximately 189 genes. CONCLUSION: We found genomewide significant evidence for linkage of refractive error to a novel QTL on chromosome 1p36 in an Ashkenazi Jewish population.
Authors: Dwight Stambolian; Elise B Ciner; Lauren C Reider; Chris Moy; Debra Dana; Robert Owens; Melissa Schlifka; Taura Holmes; Grace Ibay; Joan E Bailey-Wilson Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Robert Wojciechowski; Nathan Congdon; Heidi Bowie; Beatriz Munoz; Donna Gilbert; Sheila K West Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: T L Young; S M Ronan; A B Alvear; S C Wildenberg; W S Oetting; L D Atwood; D J Wilkin; R A King Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Venita Gresham Watson; Nicholas E Hardison; Tyndall Harris; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Howard L McLeod Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Alison P Klein; Priya Duggal; Kristine E Lee; Ching-Yu Cheng; Ronald Klein; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Barbara E K Klein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donald O Mutti; Margaret E Cooper; Sarah O'Brien; Lisa A Jones; Mary L Marazita; Jeffrey C Murray; Karla Zadnik Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: S Veerappan; M Schäche; K K Pertile; F M A Islam; C Y Chen; P Mitchell; M Dirani; P N Baird Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Tsz Kin Ng; Ching Yan Lam; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam; Sylvia Wai Yee Chiang; Pancy Oi Sin Tam; Dan Yi Wang; Bao Jian Fan; Gary Hin-Fai Yam; Dorothy Shu Ping Fan; Chi Pui Pang Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 2.367