Literature DB >> 11386525

Supraventricular tachycardia-ventricular tachycardia discrimination algorithms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: state-of-the-art review.

C D Swerdlow1.   

Abstract

To reduce inappropriate therapy of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) include algorithms to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from SVT. Dual-chamber algorithms analyze atrial and ventricular rates or AV relationship. They provide advantages over single-chamber algorithms, but introduce new ways to detect SVT as VT inappropriately and to underdetect VT. Unlike pacemakers, dual-chamber ICDs require accurate atrial sensing during high ventricular rates. A postventricular atrial blanking period prevents oversensing of far-field R waves as atrial electrograms, but causes underdetection of atrial fibrillation during high ventricular rates. Tachycardias with 1:1 AV relationship and VT during atrial tachyarrhythmias present specific SVT-VT discrimination problems. The first dual-chamber algorithms performed comparably to single-chamber algorithms. Present dual-chamber algorithms correct some limitations of earlier versions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11386525     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

1.  Recollection of pain due to inappropriate versus appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Gregory M Marcus; Derrick W Chan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Does the rate of inappropriate therapy differ in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from different manufacturers?

Authors:  Arash Arya; Majid Haghjoo; Zahra Emkanjoo; Mohammad Reza Dehghani; Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Algorithms for better arrhythmia discrimination in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  R Schimpf; C Wolpert; B Lüderitz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs: single chamber versus dual chamber.

Authors:  Juliana Gonçalves; Telmo Pereira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Repeated misclassifications of tachycardia by an implantable cardiac defibrillator.

Authors:  Atsuyuki Watanabe; Osamu Fujimura
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2019-12-14

Review 6.  The utilization of atrial sensing dipole in single lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator for detection of new-onset atrial high-rate episodes or subclinical atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuanming Pung; Daniel Zhihao Hong; Tzyy Yeou Ho; Xiayan Shen; Pei Ting Tan; Colin Yeo; Vern Hsen Tan
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 7.  ICD discrimination of SVT versus VT with 1:1 V-A conduction: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Rhanderson N Cardoso; Chris Healy; Juan Viles-Gonzalez; James O Coffey
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 8.  Successful Identification of and Discrimination Between Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmia with the Aid of Pacing and Defibrillator Devices.

Authors:  Rahul K Mukherjee; Manav Sohal; Nesan Shanmugam; Simon Pearse; Fadi Jouhra
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2021-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.