Literature DB >> 11384230

Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter.

I Muegge1, S L Heald, D Brittelli.   

Abstract

A simple pharmacophore point filter has been developed that discriminates between drug-like and nondrug-like chemical matter. It is based on the observation that nondrugs are often underfunctionalized. Therefore, a minimum count of well-defined pharmacophore points is required to pass the filter. The application of the filter results in 66-69% of subsets of the MDDR database to be classified as drug-like. Furthermore, 61-68% of subsets of the CMC database are classified as drug-like. In contrast, only 36% of the ACD are found to be drug-like. While these results are not quite as good as those obtained with recently described neural net approaches, the method used here has clear advantages. In contrast to a neural net approach and also in contrast to decision tree methods described recently, the pharmacophore filter has been developed by using "chemical wisdom" that is unbiased from fitting the structural content of specific drug databases to prediction models. Similar to decision tree methods, the pharmacophore point filter provides a detailed structural reason for the classification of each molecule as drug or nondrug. The pharmacophore point filter results are compared to neural net filter results. A statistically significant overlap between compounds recognized as drug-like validates both approaches. The pharmacophore point filter complements neural net approaches as well as property profiling approaches used as drug-likeness filters in compound library analysis and design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384230     DOI: 10.1021/jm015507e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  123 in total

Review 1.  An overview of the diversity represented in commercially-available databases.

Authors:  Mary P Bradley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Global analysis of large-scale chemical and biological experiments.

Authors:  David E Root; Brian P Kelley; Brent R Stockwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2002-05

Review 4.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 5.  An overview of the diversity represented in commercially-available databases.

Authors:  Mary P Bradley
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 6.  Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Structural studies of Bcl-xL/ligand complexes using 19F NMR.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Philip J Hajduk; Jamey Mack; Edward T Olejniczak
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Managing, profiling and analyzing a library of 2.6 million compounds gathered from 32 chemical providers.

Authors:  Aurélien Monge; Alban Arrault; Christophe Marot; Luc Morin-Allory
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.943

9.  Lessons for fragment library design: analysis of output from multiple screening campaigns.

Authors:  I-Jen Chen; Roderick E Hubbard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Towards a new age of virtual ADME/TOX and multidimensional drug discovery.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Bruno Boulanger; Peter W Swaan; Maggie A Z Hupcey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.