J Stelmack1. 1. Central Blind Rehabilitation Service, Edward Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois 60141, USA. stelmack.joan@hines.va.gov
Abstract
PURPOSE: The impact of low vision on self-reported quality of life and changes after low-vision intervention are investigated. METHODS: Literature reports from 1990 to 2000 are reviewed. RESULTS: Low vision is associated with increased risk for depression and decreased functional status and quality of life. Decreased visual acuity, visual field loss, and occasional blurred vision are also associated with decreased quality of life. Improvements in both functional status and quality of life occur after low-vision service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported quality of life is a significant outcome measure for low-vision rehabilitation. Questionnaires that are more sensitive to rehabilitation services provided as well as patient needs and goals are required to facilitate development of rehabilitation plans and to compare techniques, devices, and programs. Attention should be given to measurement properties, validity, and reliability of instruments used currently and in development of new instruments.
PURPOSE: The impact of low vision on self-reported quality of life and changes after low-vision intervention are investigated. METHODS: Literature reports from 1990 to 2000 are reviewed. RESULTS:Low vision is associated with increased risk for depression and decreased functional status and quality of life. Decreased visual acuity, visual field loss, and occasional blurred vision are also associated with decreased quality of life. Improvements in both functional status and quality of life occur after low-vision service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported quality of life is a significant outcome measure for low-vision rehabilitation. Questionnaires that are more sensitive to rehabilitation services provided as well as patient needs and goals are required to facilitate development of rehabilitation plans and to compare techniques, devices, and programs. Attention should be given to measurement properties, validity, and reliability of instruments used currently and in development of new instruments.
Authors: Bradley E Dougherty; K Bradley Kehler; Richard Jamara; Nicole Patterson; Denise Valenti; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Jason C S Leung; Timothy C Y Kwok; Dicken C C Chan; Kay W K Yuen; Anthony W L Kwok; Dicky T K Choy; Edith M C Lau; P C Leung Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Nizar Saleh Abdelfattah; Mohamed Amgad; Ahmed A Salama; Marina E Israel; Ghada A Elhawary; Ahmed E Radwan; Mohamed M Elgayar; Tamer M El Nakhal; Islam T Elkhateb; Heba A Hashem; Doha K Embaby; Amira A Elabd; Reem K Elwy; Magdi S Yacoub; Hamdy Salem; Mohamed Abdel-Baqy; Ahmad Kassem Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Erik J Groessl; Lin Liu; Marisa Sklar; Steven R Tally; Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sharon A Haymes; Jessica D Leston; Elizabeth D Ferucci; Ruth A Etzel; Anne P Lanier Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.648