T-M Kuang1,2,3, S-Y Tsai4, C J-L Liu1,2, Y-C Ko1,2, S-M Lee1,2, P Chou3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Health Management, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error in a metropolitan Chinese elderly population. METHODS: The Shihpai Eye Study 2006 included 460/824 (55.8%) subjects (age range 72-94 years old) of 1361 participants in the 1999 baseline survey for a follow-up eye examination. Visual acuity was assessed using a Snellen chart, uncorrected refractive error was defined as presenting visual acuity (naked eye if without spectacles and with distance spectacles if worn) in the better eye of <6/12 that improved to no impairment (≥6/12) after refractive correction. RESULTS: The 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-13.4%). 92.7% of participants with uncorrection and 77.8% with undercorrection were able to improve at least two lines of visual acuity by refractive correction. In multivariate analysis controlling for covariates, uncorrected refractive error was significantly related to myopia (relative risk (RR): 3.15; 95% CI: 1.31-7.58) and living alone (RR: 2.94; 95% CI 1.14-7.53), whereas distance spectacles worn during examination was protective (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.88). CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the incidence of uncorrected refractive error was high (10.5%) in this elderly Chinese population. Living alone and myopia are predisposing factors, whereas wearing distance spectacles at examination is protective.
PURPOSE: To report the 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error in a metropolitan Chinese elderly population. METHODS: The Shihpai Eye Study 2006 included 460/824 (55.8%) subjects (age range 72-94 years old) of 1361 participants in the 1999 baseline survey for a follow-up eye examination. Visual acuity was assessed using a Snellen chart, uncorrected refractive error was defined as presenting visual acuity (naked eye if without spectacles and with distance spectacles if worn) in the better eye of <6/12 that improved to no impairment (≥6/12) after refractive correction. RESULTS: The 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-13.4%). 92.7% of participants with uncorrection and 77.8% with undercorrection were able to improve at least two lines of visual acuity by refractive correction. In multivariate analysis controlling for covariates, uncorrected refractive error was significantly related to myopia (relative risk (RR): 3.15; 95% CI: 1.31-7.58) and living alone (RR: 2.94; 95% CI 1.14-7.53), whereas distance spectacles worn during examination was protective (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.88). CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the incidence of uncorrected refractive error was high (10.5%) in this elderly Chinese population. Living alone and myopia are predisposing factors, whereas wearing distance spectacles at examination is protective.
Authors: Julie Schneider; Stephen R Leeder; Bamini Gopinath; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: S K West; B Munoz; G S Rubin; O D Schein; K Bandeen-Roche; S Zeger; S German; L P Fried Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C Carabellese; I Appollonio; R Rozzini; A Bianchetti; G B Frisoni; L Frattola; M Trabucchi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Chyrisse Heine; Cathy Honge Gong; Susan Feldman; Colette Browning Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390