PURPOSE: Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide and cause visual impairment for millions of adults in the United States. We compared the sensitivity of a vision-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure to that of multiple generic measures of HRQOL before and at 2 time points after cataract surgery. METHODS: Participants completed 1 vision-specific and 5 generic quality of life measures before cataract surgery, and again 1 and 6 months after surgery. Random effects modeling was used to measure changes over the three assessment points. RESULTS: The NEI-VFQ25 total score and all 11 subscales showed significant improvements during the first interval (baseline and 1 month). During the second interval (1-6 months post-surgery), significant improvements were observed on the total score and 5 of 11 NEI-VFQ25 subscales. There were significant increases in HRQOL during the first interval on some preference-based generic HRQOL measures, though changes during the second interval were mostly non-significant. None of the SF-36v2™ or SF6D scales changed significantly between any of the assessment periods. CONCLUSIONS: The NEI-VFQ25 was sensitive to changes in vision-specific domains of QOL. Some preference-based generic HRQOL measures were also sensitive to change and showed convergence with the NEI-VFQ25, but the effects were small. The SF-36v2™ and SF-6D did not change in a similar manner, possibly reflecting a lack of vision-related content. Studies seeking to document both the vision-specific and generic HRQOL improvements of cataract surgery should consider these results when selecting measures.
PURPOSE:Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide and cause visual impairment for millions of adults in the United States. We compared the sensitivity of a vision-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure to that of multiple generic measures of HRQOL before and at 2 time points after cataract surgery. METHODS:Participants completed 1 vision-specific and 5 generic quality of life measures before cataract surgery, and again 1 and 6 months after surgery. Random effects modeling was used to measure changes over the three assessment points. RESULTS: The NEI-VFQ25 total score and all 11 subscales showed significant improvements during the first interval (baseline and 1 month). During the second interval (1-6 months post-surgery), significant improvements were observed on the total score and 5 of 11 NEI-VFQ25 subscales. There were significant increases in HRQOL during the first interval on some preference-based generic HRQOL measures, though changes during the second interval were mostly non-significant. None of the SF-36v2™ or SF6D scales changed significantly between any of the assessment periods. CONCLUSIONS: The NEI-VFQ25 was sensitive to changes in vision-specific domains of QOL. Some preference-based generic HRQOL measures were also sensitive to change and showed convergence with the NEI-VFQ25, but the effects were small. The SF-36v2™ and SF-6D did not change in a similar manner, possibly reflecting a lack of vision-related content. Studies seeking to document both the vision-specific and generic HRQOL improvements of cataract surgery should consider these results when selecting measures.
Authors: Robert M Kaplan; Steven Tally; Ron D Hays; David Feeny; Theodore G Ganiats; Mari Palta; Dennis G Fryback Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: W W IsHak; J Mirocha; D James; G Tobia; J Vilhauer; H Fakhry; S Pi; E Hanson; R Nashawati; E D Peselow; R M Cohen Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Toby O Steele; Jess C Mace; Raj Dedhia; Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith; Jeremiah A Alt Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Suzann Pershing; Victor W Henderson; Mary K Goldstein; Ying Lu; M Kate Bundorf; Moshiur Rahman; Joshua D Stein Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Suzann Pershing; Mary K Goldstein; Victor W Henderson; M Kate Bundorf; Ying Lu; Moshiur Rahman; Joshua D Stein Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 12.079