BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of all pediatric epicardial pacing leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: All epicardial leads and 1239 outpatient visits between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Pacing and sensing thresholds were reviewed at implant, at 1 month, and at subsequent 6-month intervals. Lead failure was defined as the need for replacement or abandonment due to pacing or sensing problems, lead fracture, or phrenic/muscle stimulation. A total of 123 patients underwent 207 epicardial lead (60 atrial/147 ventricular, 40% steroid) implantations (median age at implant was 4.1 years [range 1 day to 21 years]). Congenital heart disease was present in 103 (84%) of the patients. Epicardial leads were followed for 29 months (range 1 to 207 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year lead survival was 96%, 90%, and 74%, respectively. Compared with conventional epicardial leads, both atrial and ventricular steroid leads had better stimulation thresholds 1 month after implantation; however, only ventricular steroid leads had improved chronic pacing thresholds (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 1.9 muJ [from 0.26 to 16 mu]; for nonsteroid leads, 4.7 muJ [from 0.6 to 25 muJ]; P<0.01). Ventricular sensing was significantly better in steroid leads 1 month after lead implantation (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 8 mV [from 4 to 31 mV]; for nonsteroid leads, 4 mV [from 0.7 to 10 mV]; P<0.01). Neither congenital heart disease, lead implantation with a concomitant cardiac operation, age or weight at implantation, nor the chamber paced was predictive of lead failure. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid epicardial leads demonstrated relatively stable acute and chronic pacing and sensing thresholds. In this evaluation of >200 epicardial leads, lead survival was good, with steroid-eluting leads demonstrating results similar to those found with historical conventional endocardial leads.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of all pediatric epicardial pacing leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: All epicardial leads and 1239 outpatient visits between January 1, 1983, and June 30, 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. Pacing and sensing thresholds were reviewed at implant, at 1 month, and at subsequent 6-month intervals. Lead failure was defined as the need for replacement or abandonment due to pacing or sensing problems, lead fracture, or phrenic/muscle stimulation. A total of 123 patients underwent 207 epicardial lead (60 atrial/147 ventricular, 40% steroid) implantations (median age at implant was 4.1 years [range 1 day to 21 years]). Congenital heart disease was present in 103 (84%) of the patients. Epicardial leads were followed for 29 months (range 1 to 207 months). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year lead survival was 96%, 90%, and 74%, respectively. Compared with conventional epicardial leads, both atrial and ventricular steroid leads had better stimulation thresholds 1 month after implantation; however, only ventricular steroid leads had improved chronic pacing thresholds (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 1.9 muJ [from 0.26 to 16 mu]; for nonsteroid leads, 4.7 muJ [from 0.6 to 25 muJ]; P<0.01). Ventricular sensing was significantly better in steroid leads 1 month after lead implantation (at 2 years: for steroid leads, 8 mV [from 4 to 31 mV]; for nonsteroid leads, 4 mV [from 0.7 to 10 mV]; P<0.01). Neither congenital heart disease, lead implantation with a concomitant cardiac operation, age or weight at implantation, nor the chamber paced was predictive of lead failure. CONCLUSIONS:Steroid epicardial leads demonstrated relatively stable acute and chronic pacing and sensing thresholds. In this evaluation of >200 epicardial leads, lead survival was good, with steroid-eluting leads demonstrating results similar to those found with historical conventional endocardial leads.
Authors: Sarah Chambers; Alex Rusanov; Henry M Spotnitz; Eric S Silver; Leonardo Liberman Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Geoffrey D Huntley; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Carole A Warnes; Suraj Kapa; Alexander C Egbe Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Craig C Benson; Anne M Valente; Katherine E Economy; Yael Hoffman-Sage; Laura M Bevilacqua; Mihaela Podovei; Alexander R Opotowsky Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Christopher John McLeod; Christine H Attenhofer Jost; Carole A Warnes; David Hodge; Linda Hyberger; Heidi M Connolly; Samuel J Asirvatham; Joseph A Dearani; David L Hayes; Naser M Ammash Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 1.900