Literature DB >> 11376041

Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.

S Mirrett1, R J Everts, L B Reller.   

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of BacT/ALERT FA (FA) medium, a new aerobic BacT/ALERT FAN (FAN) medium (Organon Teknika Corporation, Durham, N.C.) that does not require the added cost and inconvenience of a venting unit, we inoculated blood specimens from adult patients with suspected sepsis into an original FAN aerobic culture bottle and an FA bottle. Of 7,745 blood culture sets containing both bottles, 5,256 (68%) met the criteria for adequacy of filling. A total of 466 isolates judged to represent the causes of true infections were recovered from 276 patients; 271 isolates were recovered from both bottles, 82 were recovered from the FAN bottle only, and 113 were recovered from the FA bottle only (P < 0.05). More Burkholderia cepacia isolates (P < 0.01), Candida albicans isolates (P < 0.001), Cryptococcus neoformans isolates (P < 0.01), yeasts overall (P < 0.001), and total microorganisms (P < 0.05) were recovered from FA bottles. Of cultures found to be positive within the first 72 h of incubation, the mean times to detection were almost identical for FAN (20.4 h) and FA (20.7 h) bottles. Of 263 isolates that caused monomicrobic episodes of bloodstream infections, 180 were detected in both bottles, 32 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 51 were detected in FA bottles only (P < 0.05). Of 186 isolates considered to be contaminants, 63 were detected in both media, 64 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 59 were detected in FA bottles only (P was not significant). The number of false-positive results were comparable: 69 (1.3%) in FAN bottles and 56 (1.1%) in FA bottles. However, there were 14 isolates with false-negative results (6 yeasts, 6 nonfermenters, and 1 isolate each of Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci) in FAN bottles, whereas there were none in FA bottles. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the new nonvented FA bottle is superior to the original vented FAN medium for the recovery of B. cepacia and yeasts, especially C. albicans and C. neoformans, and is comparable to FAN medium for other microorganisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376041      PMCID: PMC88095          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  3 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of nonvented aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottle and standard aerobic bottle for detection of microorganisms in blood.

Authors:  J W Snyder; K S Benzing; G K Munier; G D Bostic; P S Bozigar; R Hanna; M J Zervos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; M L Towns; S M Quartey; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; G Parmigiani; L B Reller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; M L Wilson; S Smith-Elekes; C R Chuard; K L Joho; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the BacT/Alert PF pediatric FAN blood culture bottle with the standard pediatric blood culture bottle, the Pedi-BacT.

Authors:  K K Krisher; P Gibb; S Corbett; D Church
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Contamination of catheter-drawn blood cultures.

Authors:  R J Everts; E N Vinson; P O Adholla; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Routine incubation of BacT/ALERT FA and FN blood culture bottles for more than 3 days may not be necessary.

Authors:  Paul P Bourbeau; Michael Foltzer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative recovery of microorganisms from BacT/ALERT plastic and glass FA and FN blood culture bottles.

Authors:  J A Riley; B J Heiter; P P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Controlled clinical comparison of plastic versus glass bottles of BacT/ALERT PF medium for culturing blood from children.

Authors:  Cathy A Petti; Stanley Mirrett; Christopher W Woods; L Barth Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.

Authors:  Diane Flayhart; Anita P Borek; Teresa Wakefield; James Dick; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of acridine orange staining as a replacement of subcultures for BacT/ALERT-positive, gram stain-negative blood cultures.

Authors:  Hildegard Adler; Nathalie Baumlin; Reno Frei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated blood culture systems for candida growth detection.

Authors:  Lynn L Horvath; Benjamin J George; Clinton K Murray; Linda S Harrison; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis.

Authors:  Nicasio Mancini; Silvia Carletti; Nadia Ghidoli; Paola Cichero; Roberto Burioni; Massimo Clementi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Blood Culture Bottle and Standard Culture Bottle Methods for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion.

Authors:  Surapan Charoentunyarak; Sarassawan Kananuraks; Jarin Chindaprasirt; Panita Limpawattana; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.