Literature DB >> 11375232

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.

J Morrison1, L Carroll, S Twaddle, I Cameron, J Grimshaw, A Leyland, H Baillie, G Watt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of clinical guidelines on the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.
DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: General practices and NHS hospitals accepting referrals for infertility in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area. PARTICIPANTS: All 221 general practices in Glasgow; 214 completed the trial. INTERVENTION: General practices in the intervention arm received clinical guidelines developed locally. Control practices received them one year later. Dissemination of the guidelines included educational meetings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time from presentation to referral, investigations completed in general practice, the number and content of visits as a hospital outpatient, the time to reach a management plan, and costs for referrals from the two groups.
RESULTS: Data on 689 referrals were collected. No significant difference was found in referral rates for infertility. Fewer than 1% of couples were referred inappropriately early. Referrals from intervention practices were significantly more likely to have all relevant investigations carried out (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.75, P=0.025). 70% of measurements of serum progesterone concentrations during the midluteal phase and 34% of semen analyses were repeated at least once in hospital, despite having been recorded as normal when checked in general practice. No difference was found in the proportion of referrals in which a management plan was reached within one year or in the mean duration between first appointment and date of management plan. NHS costs were not significantly affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of infertility guidelines by commonly used methods results in a modest increase in referrals having recommended investigations completed in general practice, but there are no detectable differences in outcome for patients or reduction in costs. Clinicians in secondary care tended to fail to respond to changes in referral practice by doctors. Guidelines that aim to improve the referral process need to be disseminated and implemented so as to lead to changes in both primary care and secondary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375232      PMCID: PMC31924          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Confidence intervals should be used in reporting trials.

Authors:  M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R Grol; A Hutchinson; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

3.  Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples?

Authors:  C Emslie; J Grimshaw; A Templeton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-26

Review 4.  Female infertility: causes and treatment.

Authors:  D L Healy; A O Trounson; A N Andersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-06-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Thompson; A L Kinmonth; L Stevens; R C Peveler; A Stevens; K J Ostler; R M Pickering; N G Baker; A Henson; J Preece; D Cooper; M J Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  Implementing national guidelines at local level.

Authors:  R F Jankowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

2.  Evaluating guidelines across primary care-secondary care interface. Methodological weaknesses and poor reporting undermine authors' conclusions.

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

Review 3.  A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care.

Authors:  Alex Faulkner; Nicola Mills; David Bainton; Kate Baxter; Paul Kinnersley; Tim J Peters; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Scott Wilkes; Alison Murdoch; Nick Steen; John Wilsdon; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol.

Authors:  Remah M Kamel
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.

Authors:  Lindsay Blank; Susan Baxter; Helen Buckley Woods; Elizabeth Goyder; Andrew Lee; Nick Payne; Melanie Rimmer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Reassured or fobbed off? Perspectives on infertility consultations in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa Hinton; Jenny J Kurinczuk; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Evaluating decision aids--where next?

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.