Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Literature DB >> 10024268

Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

S H Woolf¹, R Grol, A Hutchinson, M Eccles, J Grimshaw.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 1999 PMID： 10024268 PMCID： PMC1114973 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

8 in total

1. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

Authors: D J Cook; C D Mulrow; R B Haynes
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1997-03-01 Impact factor: 25.391

2. Shared decision-making: the case for letting patients decide which choice is best.

Authors: S H Woolf
Journal: J Fam Pract Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 0.493

3. Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

Authors: M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245

4. Creating practice guidelines: the dangers of over-reliance on expert judgment.

Authors: R L Kane
Journal: J Law Med Ethics Date: 1995 Impact factor: 1.718

5. Implementing clinical guidelines. It works in Australia.

Authors: M Hemming; M L Mashford
Journal: BMJ Date: 1993-09-11

Review 6. Containing costs while improving quality of care: the role of profiling and practice guidelines.

Authors: D W Shapiro; R D Lasker; A B Bindman; P R Lee
Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 1993 Impact factor: 21.981

7. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors: J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-11-27 Impact factor: 79.321

8. Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

Authors: V A Entwistle; I S Watt; H Davis; R Dickson; D Pickard; J Rosser
Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.188

8 in total

476 in total

4. Developing valid cost effectiveness guidelines: a methodological report from the north of England evidence based guideline development project.

Authors: M Eccles; J Mason; N Freemantle
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 2000-06

Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

1. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

2. Shared decision-making: the case for letting patients decide which choice is best.

3. Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

4. Creating practice guidelines: the dangers of over-reliance on expert judgment.

5. Implementing clinical guidelines. It works in Australia.

Review 6. Containing costs while improving quality of care: the role of profiling and practice guidelines.

7. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

8. Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

Review 1. Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines.

2. NICE: a panacea for the NHS?

3. Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.

4. Developing valid cost effectiveness guidelines: a methodological report from the north of England evidence based guideline development project.

5. When should clinical guidelines be updated?

6. Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of smoking cessation.

7. Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis.

8. Implementing national guidelines at local level.

9. Impaired glucose tolerance: qualitative and quantitative study of general practitioners' knowledge and perceptions.

Review 10. Heart disease, guidelines, regulations, and the law.