Literature DB >> 11371786

Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future?

J Rassweiler1, J Binder, T Frede.   

Abstract

In urology, at the end of the last millennium, there was an increasing use of computerized technology, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, microwave therapy and high-energy focused ultrasound. However, experience with manipulating robots in urological surgery is still very limited. Laparoscopic surgery is handicapped by a reduction of the range of motion because of the fixed trocar position. The da Vinci system is the first surgical system to address all these problems adequately. The system consists of two main components: the surgeon's viewing and control console with three-dimensional imaging and the surgical arm unit that positions and manoeuvres detachable surgical instruments. The surgeon performs the procedure seated at the console holding specially designed instruments. Telerobotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy provides advantages such as stereovision, dexterity and tremor filtering, but there is a learning curve with the device, mainly because of the magnification, the three-dimensional image and the lack of tactile feedback. However, after only a short period of time, the experienced surgeon is able to become familiar with the device. The impact of robotics in urological surgery is therefore very promising, and we are convinced that it will totally change the future of urological surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371786     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Leif E Olsson; Fabien Saint; Dominique Chopin; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical characteristics of remote Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 40 cases.

Authors:  Han-Xin Zhou; Yue-Hua Guo; Xiao-Fang Yu; Shi-Yun Bao; Jia-Lin Liu; Yue Zhang; Yong-Gong Ren; Qun Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  [Robots in urology-an analysis of current and future devices].

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; A S Goezen; M C Rassweiler-Seyfried; E Liatsikos; T Bach; J-U Stolzenburg; J Klein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; Mani Menon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Enrique Ian S Lorenzo; Wooju Jeong; Cheol Kyu Oh; Ho Song Yu; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.