Literature DB >> 11370750

From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.

H Forss1, E Widström.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain information on restorative dental care in Finland and to analyze the changes in treatment over a 5-year period. A random sample of dentists was drawn from the registers of the health authorities and the dental association in Finland, and in the spring of 1997 a questionnaire was sent requesting the dentists to record information for each restoration placed during a given period. A total of 1,229 dentists were contacted, and 659 responded. The dentists treated 5,305 adults during the study period and placed 6,322 restorations. The most common restorative material was composite resin, which was used in 74.9% of the restorations, whereas amalgam was used in 4.8% and glass ionomers in 9.4% of the restorations. The median ages of failed restorations were nearly 12 years for amalgam, slightly less than 5 years for composite, and slightly more than 4 years for glass ionomer. The results indicate that clinical dentistry in Finland has made a definite step towards the post-amalgam era. However, the functional periods of the failed tooth-colored restorations were disappointingly short and warrant some serious consideration.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11370750     DOI: 10.1080/000163501750157090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  9 in total

1.  Knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners towards posterior composite restorations in northern saudi arabia.

Authors:  Iftikhar Akbar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  Occupational exposure in dentistry and miscarriage.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Lindbohm; Pekka Ylöstalo; Markku Sallmén; Maj-Len Henriks-Eckerman; Tuula Nurminen; Helena Forss; Helena Taskinen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Sonia K Makhija; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Hydrophobic and antimicrobial dentin: A peptide-based 2-tier protective system for dental resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Dina G Moussa; Alex Fok; Conrado Aparicio
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Funkhouser; Jeffrey L Fellows; Douglass G Shamp; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey S Meral; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations.

Authors:  Kyou-Li Kim; Cheol Namgung; Byeong-Hoon Cho
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-02-26

7.  The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.

Authors:  Simen E Kopperud; Frode Staxrud; Ivar Espelid; Anne Bjørg Tveit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effects of adding silica particles on certain properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Nayef H Felemban; Mohamed I Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Amalgam Phase-Down Part 2: UK-Based Knowledge, Opinions, and Confidence in the Alternatives.

Authors:  O Bailey; C R Vernazza; S Stone; L Ternent; A-G Roche; C Lynch
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2020-12-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.