Literature DB >> 11359892

Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture.

A Vinicombe1, A Raspovic, H B Menz.   

Abstract

This study evaluated two methods for quantifying foot posture: navicular drop and navicular drift. Five clinicians measured 20 nonpathological participants on two occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.76 for navicular drop and from 0.31 to 0.62 for navicular drift. The standard error of measurement, as a 95% confidence interval, ranged from +/-1.5 mm to +/-3.5 mm for navicular drop and +/-3 mm to +/-5 mm for navicular drift. Intratester reliability was slightly better than intertester reliability for both measurements. These results indicate that both techniques are only moderately reliable, and physicians using these measurements in clinical practice should interpret the values in light of the magnitude of error associated with them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359892     DOI: 10.7547/87507315-91-5-262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  24 in total

1.  Navicular bone position determined by positional MRI: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Philip Hansen; Finn E Johannsen; Stine Hangaard; Sandra E Stallknecht; Bjarke B Hansen; Janus D Nybing; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading.

Authors:  Søren Spörndly-Nees; Brian Dåsberg; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Morten Ilum Boesen; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

3.  The relationship among foot posture, core and lower extremity muscle function, and postural stability.

Authors:  Stephen C Cobb; David M Bazett-Jones; Mukta N Joshi; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm; C Roger James
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Muscle-Activation Onset Times With Shoes and Foot Orthoses in Participants With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Bart Dingenen; Louis Peeraer; Kevin Deschamps; Steffen Fieuws; Luc Janssens; Filip Staes
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  A digital photographic measurement method for quantifying foot posture: validity, reliability, and descriptive data.

Authors:  Stephen C Cobb; C Roger James; Matthew Hjertstedt; James Kruk
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Foot posture in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Mohammad R Fotoohabadi; Julian A Feller; John R Bartlett; Neil R Bergman
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Sagittal plane blockage of the foot, ankle and hallux and foot alignment-prevalence and association with low back pain.

Authors:  James W Brantingham; Joanne Lee Gilbert; Junaid Shaik; Gary Globe
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2006

8.  Visual categorisation of the arch index: a simplified measure of foot posture in older people.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Mohammad R Fotoohabadi; Elin Wee; Martin J Spink
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Bill Vicenzino; Mark W Cornwall; Natalie Collins; Meghan Warren
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Inter-rater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) in the assessment of the paediatric foot.

Authors:  Stewart C Morrison; Jill Ferrari
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.