Literature DB >> 21904698

The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading.

Søren Spörndly-Nees, Brian Dåsberg, Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen, Morten Ilum Boesen, Henning Langberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lower limb injuries are a large problem in athletes. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on the relationship between alignment of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot and development of such injuries. A reliable and valid test to quantify foot type is needed to be able to investigate the relationship between arch type and injury likelihood. Feiss Line is a valid clinical measure of the MLA. However, no study has investigated the reliability of the test.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to describe a modified version of the Feiss Line test and to determine the intra- and inter-tester reliability of this new foot alignment test. To emphasize the purpose of the modified test, the authors have named it The Navicular Position Test.
METHODS: Intra- and inter-tester reliability were evaluated of The Navicular Position Test with the use of ICC (interclass correlation coefficient) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement on 43 healthy, young, subjects.
RESULTS: Inter-tester mean difference -0.35 degrees [-1.32; 0.62] p = 0.47. Bland-Altman limits of agreement -6.55 to 5.85 degrees, ICC = 0.94. Intra-tester mean difference 0.47 degrees [-0.57; 1.50] p = 0.37. Bland-Altman limits of agreement -6.15 to 7.08 degrees, ICC = 0.91. DISCUSSION: The present data support The Navicular Position Test as a reliable test of the navicular bone position during rest and loading measured in a simple test set-up.
CONCLUSION: The Navicular Position Test was shown to have a high intraday-, intra- and inter-tester reliability. When cut off values to categorize the MLA into planus, rectus, or cavus feet, has been determined and presented, the test could be used in prospective observational studies investigating the role of the arch type on the development of various lower limb injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feiss Line; Foot; alignment; pronation; reliability

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904698      PMCID: PMC3163999     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  33 in total

1.  Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking.

Authors:  M W Cornwall; T G McPoil
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Arch structure and injury patterns in runners.

Authors:  D S Williams; I S McClay; J Hamill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Prediction of dynamic foot posture during running using the longitudinal arch angle.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Mark W Cornwall
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N van Gent; D Siem; M van Middelkoop; A G van Os; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Alan Hreljac
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.784

6.  Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner.

Authors:  D M Brody
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test.

Authors:  A M Picciano; M S Rowlands; T Worrell
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Consistency of visual assessments of arch height among clinicians.

Authors:  D N Cowan; J R Robinson; B H Jones; D W Polly; B H Berrey
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  A prospective investigation of biomechanical risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome: the Joint Undertaking to Monitor and Prevent ACL Injury (JUMP-ACL) cohort.

Authors:  Michelle C Boling; Darin A Padua; Stephen W Marshall; Kevin Guskiewicz; Scott Pyne; Anthony Beutler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Determination of normal values for navicular drop during walking: a new model correcting for foot length and gender.

Authors:  Rasmus G Nielsen; Michael S Rathleff; Ole H Simonsen; Henning Langberg
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  6 in total

1.  Low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eda Cinar; Shikha Saxena; Fatma Uygur
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Esther Velasco-Ramos; Maria Ruiz Muñoz; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Validity and inter-rater reliability of ankle motion observed during a single leg squat.

Authors:  Paloma Guillén-Rogel; Cristina San Emeterio; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Determining the knee joint laxity between the pronated foot and normal arched foot in adult participants.

Authors:  Fayez Alahmri; Saad Alsaadi; Mohammad Ahsan; Sarah Alqhtani
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Comparison of 3D Hip Joint Kinematics in People with Asymptomatic Pronation of the Foot and Non-Pronation Controls.

Authors:  Fayez Alahmri; Saad Alsaadi; Mohammed Ahsan
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  A comparison of the free moment pattern between normal and hyper-pronated aligned feet in female subjects during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Yazdani F; Razeghi M; Ebrahimi S
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.