OBJECTIVE: To compare serum estrone sulfate (E1S) levels in postmenopausal women during long-term treatment with commonly prescribed doses oforal and transdermal estradiol (E2). DESIGN: A retrospective study performed in a University setting in the United States involving 33 healthy postmenopausal women. Two groups of postmenopausal women were studied: group 1 (n = 10) received 1 mg oral micronized E2 daily for 16 months; blood was drawn at 0, 7, and 15 months. Group 2 (n = 23) was randomized into three subgroups. Two of the subgroups (n = 8; n = 7) received E2 delivered at a rate of 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day, respectively, by transdermal patch, changed twice weekly; the third subgroup received a placebo (without E2) patch for 9 continuous months. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 6, and 9 months. Serum E1S and E2 were quantified by specific radioimmunoassays. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: After oral E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly (p < 0.01) from baseline, reaching an average level of 38.8 ng/mL at 15 months. After transdermal E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly, yet to a much lesser extent, reaching levels of 1.8 ng/mL and 3.2 ng/mL after 9 months of treatment with the 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day patches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Markedly elevated levels of E1S were found after long-term oral estrogen treatment. In comparison to the increase in E1S levels after long-term oral estrogen treatment, there was only a small increase in E1S levels after transdermal E2 therapy. This difference may be attributed to the higher dosage of oral E2 that is required because of the low bioavailability compared with the transdermal dosages.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare serum estrone sulfate (E1S) levels in postmenopausal women during long-term treatment with commonly prescribed doses of oral and transdermal estradiol (E2). DESIGN: A retrospective study performed in a University setting in the United States involving 33 healthy postmenopausal women. Two groups of postmenopausal women were studied: group 1 (n = 10) received 1 mg oral micronized E2 daily for 16 months; blood was drawn at 0, 7, and 15 months. Group 2 (n = 23) was randomized into three subgroups. Two of the subgroups (n = 8; n = 7) received E2 delivered at a rate of 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day, respectively, by transdermal patch, changed twice weekly; the third subgroup received a placebo (without E2) patch for 9 continuous months. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 6, and 9 months. Serum E1S and E2 were quantified by specific radioimmunoassays. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: After oral E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly (p < 0.01) from baseline, reaching an average level of 38.8 ng/mL at 15 months. After transdermal E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly, yet to a much lesser extent, reaching levels of 1.8 ng/mL and 3.2 ng/mL after 9 months of treatment with the 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day patches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Markedly elevated levels of E1S were found after long-term oral estrogen treatment. In comparison to the increase in E1S levels after long-term oral estrogen treatment, there was only a small increase in E1S levels after transdermal E2 therapy. This difference may be attributed to the higher dosage of oral E2 that is required because of the low bioavailability compared with the transdermal dosages.
Authors: Eunjung Lee; Sue A Ingles; David Van Den Berg; Wei Wang; Chris Lavallee; Mei-Hua Huang; Carolyn J Crandall; Frank Z Stanczyk; Gail A Greendale; Giske Ursin Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ghada N Farhat; Neeta Parimi; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joann E Manson; Garnet Anderson; Alison J Huang; Eric Vittinghoff; Jennifer S Lee; Andrea Z Lacroix; Jane A Cauley; Rebecca Jackson; Deborah Grady; Dorothy S Lane; Lawrence Phillips; Michael S Simon; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: V M Miller; D M Black; E A Brinton; M J Budoff; M I Cedars; H N Hodis; R A Lobo; J E Manson; G R Merriam; F Naftolin; N Santoro; H S Taylor; S M Harman Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Min Guan; Gail A Laughlin; Giske A Ursin; Frank Z Stanczyk; Sue A Ingles; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Gail A Greendale Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rachel Sparks; Cornelia M Ulrich; Jeannette Bigler; Shelley S Tworoger; Yutaka Yasui; Kumar B Rajan; Peggy Porter; Frank Z Stanczyk; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Xiaopu Yuan; Ming Gang Lin; Lynda McVarish; Erin J Aiello; Anne McTiernan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-29 Impact factor: 6.466