Literature DB >> 11354785

Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies.

V Chadha1, U Garg, U S Alon.   

Abstract

The measurement of urine concentration provides information concerning the kidney's ability to appropriately respond to variations in fluid homeostasis. It also assists in the interpretation of other tests performed on the same urine specimen. The gold standard of estimating urinary concentration is the measurement of its osmolality; however, this procedure is not readily available to the practicing physician. Therefore, urine concentration is usually determined by measurement of its specific gravity (SG), which provides a fair estimate of urine osmolality. Over the years numerous tests have been developed to measure urine SG in a simple, quick, reliable and easily available method. These tests measure SG either directly (e.g., gravimetry) or by indirect methods (e.g., refractometry and reagent strip). All these tests have certain limitations based on their underlying physical principles. Specific gravity as measured by refractometry is influenced by proteinuria, such that for each 10 g/l protein the SG increases by 0.003. SG is also influenced by glucosuria such that it increases by approximately 0.002 per 10 g/l glucose when compared with urinary osmolality. Unlike osmolality, which is only affected by the number of particles, refractometry is affected by number, mass and chemical structure of the dissolved particles; hence large molecules like radiographic contrast or mannitol will increase SG relative to osmolality. The reagent strip is minimally affected by glucose, mannitol or radiographic contrast. However, it is affected by urinary pH such that only urine in the pH range of 7.0-7.5 can be correctly interpreted. The measurement of SG by reagent strip is based on the ionic strength of the urine and thus is significantly affected by the ionic composition of the urine and by proteins which have an electric charge in solution. In our experience, SG measured by the refractometer is consistently more accurate than the reagent strip. For the clinician who is interpreting urine SG results, it is important to be aware of these limitations and understand the reasons for possible potential errors of each particular method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11354785     DOI: 10.1007/s004670000551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  41 in total

1.  Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?

Authors:  Sethi Imran; Goldwater Eva; Shutty Christopher; Ethan Flynn; David Henner
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Performance Evaluation of Three URiSCAN Devices for Routine Urinalysis.

Authors:  Kiwoong Ko; Min-Jung Kwon; Seungho Ryu; Hee-Yeon Woo; Hyosoon Park
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Influence of body mass index status on urinary creatinine and specific gravity for epidemiological study of children.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Chuanxi Tang; Hexing Wang; Wei Zhou; Yue Chen; Ying Zhou; Qingwu Jiang
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Essentials of laboratory medicine for the nephrology clinician.

Authors:  Tarak Srivastava; Uttam Garg; Y Raymond Chan; Uri S Alon
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  A comparison of creatinine vs. specific gravity to correct for urinary dilution of cotinine.

Authors:  Joshua E Muscat; Anderson Liu; John P Richie
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  The biochemical diagnosis of Gitelman disease and the definition of "hypocalciuria".

Authors:  Mario G Bianchetti; Alberto Edefonti; Alberto Bettinelli
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Association of arsenic with kidney function in adolescents and young adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2012.

Authors:  Darcy Weidemann; Chin-Chi Kuo; Ana Navas-Acien; Alison G Abraham; Virginia Weaver; Jeffrey Fadrowski
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Influence of preanalytic and analytic variables in canine and feline urine specific gravity measurement by refractometer.

Authors:  Martina Mösch; Sven Reese; Karin Weber; Katrin Hartmann; Roswitha Dorsch
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.279

9.  Comparative analysis of creatinine and osmolality as urine normalization strategies in targeted metabolomics for the differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD.

Authors:  Mona M Khamis; Teagan Holt; Hanan Awad; Anas El-Aneed; Darryl J Adamko
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.290

10.  Metabolomics reveals elevated urinary excretion of collagen degradation and epithelial cell turnover products in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Authors:  Mai Yamamoto; Maria Ines Pinto-Sanchez; Premysl Bercik; Philip Britz-McKibbin
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.