Literature DB >> 11354744

International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions.

S H Heywang-Köbrunner1, U Bick, W G Bradley, B Boné, J Casselman, A Coulthard, U Fischer, M Müller-Schimpfle, H Oellinger, R Patt, J Teubner, M Friedrich, G Newstead, R Holland, A Schauer, E A Sickles, L Tabar, J Waisman, K D Wernecke.   

Abstract

A multicentre study was undertaken to provide fundamentals for improved standardization and optimized interpretation guidelines of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Only patients scheduled for biopsy of a clinical or imaging abnormality were included. They underwent standardized dynamic MRI on Siemens 1.0 (163 valid lesions > or = 5 mm) or 1.5 T (395 valid lesions > or = 5 mm) using 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH; 87 s) before and five times after standardized bolus of 0.2 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg. One-Tesla and 1.5 T data were analysed separately using a discriminant analysis. Only histologically correlated lesions entered the statistical evaluation. Histopathology and imaging were correlated in retrospect and in open. The best results were achieved by combining up to five wash-in or wash-out parameters. Different weighting of false-negative vs false-positive calls allowed formulation of a statistically based interpretation scheme yielding optimized rules for the highest possible sensitivity (specificity 30%), for moderate (50%) or high (64-71%) specificity. The sensitivities obtained at the above specificity levels were better at 1.0 T (98, 97, or 96%) than at 1.5 T (96, 93, 86%). Using a widely available standardized MR technique definition of statistically founded interpretation rules is possible. Choice of an optimum interpretation rule may vary with the clinical question. Prospective testing remains necessary. Differences of 1.0 and 1.5 T are not statistically significant but may be due to pulse sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11354744     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Authors:  Toni W Vomweg; Andrea Teifke; R Peter Kunz; Christian Hintze; Alexander Hlawatsch; Annett Kern; Karl F Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development and characterization of a dynamic lesion phantom for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Prasanna Hariharan; Matthew R Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Gregory S Karczmar; Cheng Yang; Sean Foxley; Sanaz Arkani; Wendy Recant; Marta A Zamora; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Xiaobing Fan; Gregory S Karczmar; Hiroyuki Abe; Robert A Schmidt; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Size assessment of breast lesions by means of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  G Levrini; R Sghedoni; C Mori; A Botti; R Vacondio; A Nitrosi; M Iori; F Nicoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen L Giger; Sanaz A Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography.

Authors:  R Cubuk; N Tasali; B Narin; F Keskiner; L Celik; S Guney
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Clinical implementation of a multislice high spectral and spatial resolution-based MRI sequence to achieve unilateral full-breast coverage.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Akiko Shimauchi; Marta A Zamora; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.