Literature DB >> 11353962

Prospective evaluation of the systemic immune response following abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

E Malik1, O Buchweitz, M Müller-Steinhardt, P Kressin, A Meyhöfer-Malik, K Diedrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in serum levels of cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) and acute-phase protein C-reactive protein (CRP) correlate directly with extent of tissue damage and inflammatory reaction. We therefore prospectively compared the postoperative levels of IL-6 and CRP following abdominal (AH), vaginal (VH), and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
METHODS: A total of 29 patients were included in the study (10 VH, 10 LAVH, 9 AH). Nine blood samples were taken from each patient at various time points before, during, and after surgery. CRP and IL-6 were measured under standardized conditions using ELISA and turbidometry.
RESULTS: Preoperative levels of IL-6 and CRP were low in all three patient groups. There was a significant increase in the IL-6 level in patients undergoing AH at the time of peritoneal closure that reached a maximum 2 h postoperatively and remained significantly elevated for 12 h postoperatively when compared to the IL-6 levels of patients undergoing VH or LAVH (p < 0.05). The levels of the IL-6 time courses differed significantly among the three operative procedures (p = 0.013). In contrast, the levels of the CRP time courses did not differ significantly (p = 0.066); however, CRP expression was elevated 36 h postoperatively in patients undergoing AH, as compared with those undergoing VH.
CONCLUSION: Elevated IL-6 levels subsequent to AH may reflect significantly greater tissue damage in these patients than in patients who undergo VH or LAVH. LAVH should therefore be considered in cases that cannot be managed by the vaginal route alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353962     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.

Authors:  W N Spellacy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Complications after 106 laparoscopic hysterectomies].

Authors:  E Malik; M Schmidt; P Scheidel
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1997

4.  The postoperative inflammatory response to injury following laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  M Labib; S Palfrey; E Paniagua; R Callender
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.057

5.  Intramyometrial coring as an adjunct to vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  S R Kovac
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Nezhat; C H Nezhat; D Admon; S Gordon; C Nezhat
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Response of serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity.

Authors:  A M Cruickshank; W D Fraser; H J Burns; J Van Damme; A Shenkin
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.124

8.  The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study.

Authors:  M P Vessey; L Villard-Mackintosh; K McPherson; A Coulter; D Yeates
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-05

9.  Response of serum cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Cho; A J LaPorta; J R Clark; M J Schofield; S L Hammond; P L Mallory
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  R Marana; M Busacca; E Zupi; N Garcea; P Paparella; G F Catalano
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Buunen; M Gholghesaei; R Veldkamp; D W Meijer; H J Bonjer; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  No Correlation Between Serum Markers and Early Functional Outcome After Contemporary THA.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Michael J Taunton; Atul F Kamath; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model.

Authors:  Maria Bergström; Asghar Azadani; Peter Falk; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Y W Novitsky; D E M Litwin; M P Callery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.

Authors:  Patrick F Bergin; Jason D Doppelt; Curtis J Kephart; Michael T Benke; James H Graeter; Andrew S Holmes; Hana Haleem-Smith; Rocky S Tuan; Anthony S Unger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsamis; George Theodoropoulos; Paraskevas Stamopoulos; Spyridon Siakavellas; Thalassini Delistathi; Nikolaos V Michalopoulos; George C Zografos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyeong A So; Jae Kwan Lee; Jae Yun Song; Jae Won Kim; Nak Woo Lee; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Yong Jung Song; Yong Jin Na; Chun Hoe Ku; Jin Woo Shin; Chul Jung Kim; Un Suk Jung
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cai-Ying Hou; Xiu-Li Li; Feng Jiang; Rong Jie Gong; Xin Yu Guo; Yuan-Qing Yao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Cytokine response in the postoperative period after surgical treatment of benign adnexal masses: comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  A Torres; K Torres; T Paszkowski; G J Staśkiewicz; R Maciejewski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.453

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.