Literature DB >> 11353462

Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence.

M H Kearney1.   

Abstract

Evaluation of qualitative findings for application to nursing practice can go beyond the rigor with which the evidence was developed to the characteristics of the findings themselves. Five categories of qualitative findings are described that vary in their levels of complexity and discovery: those restricted by a priori frameworks, descriptive categories, shared pathway or meaning, depiction of experiential variation, and dense explanatory description. Four modes of clinical application of qualitative evidence are proposed-insight or empathy, assessment of status or progress, anticipatory guidance, and coaching-that vary in their degree of visibility and patient involvement. The greater the complexity and discovery within qualitative findings, the stronger may be the potential for clinical application. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353462     DOI: 10.1002/nur.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  17 in total

1.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Health Information Technology (I-HIT) scale.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes; Ann Hurley; Margaret Cashen; Suzanne Bakken; Mary E Duffy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Qualitative research findings as evidence: utility in nursing practice.

Authors:  Wendy R Miller
Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.067

3.  New approaches to qualitative interviewing: Development of a card sort technique to understand subjective patterns of symptoms and responses.

Authors:  Jennifer R Mammen; Sally A Norton; Hyekyun Rhee; Arlene M Butz
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Patient and family members' perceptions of palliative care in heart failure.

Authors:  Maureen Metzger; Sally A Norton; Jill R Quinn; Robert Gramling
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience.

Authors:  Alexis D Bakos; Sadie P Hutson; Jennifer T Loud; June A Peters; Ruthann M Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A patient-centered longitudinal care plan: vision versus reality.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes; Lipika Samal; Moreen Donahue; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Ann C Hurley; Omar Hasan; Terrance A O'Malley; Arjun K Venkatesh; Lynn A Volk; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A randomized controlled pilot trial to improve advance care planning for LVAD patients and their surrogates.

Authors:  Maureen Metzger; Mi-Kyung Song; Sandra Ward; Patricia Pat-Yue Chang; Laura C Hanson; Feng-Chang Lin
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Why do patients in acute care hospitals fall? Can falls be prevented?

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes; Diane L Carroll; Ann C Hurley; Angela Benoit; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.737

9.  "That Don't Work for Me": Patients' and Family Members' Perspectives on Palliative Care and Hospice in Late-Stage Heart Failure.

Authors:  Maureen Metzger; Sally A Norton; Jill R Quinn; Robert Gramling
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.918

Review 10.  How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Louise Demers; Marcus J Fuhrer; Jeffrey W Jutai; James Lenker; Frank DeRuyter
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.