Literature DB >> 17460123

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Health Information Technology (I-HIT) scale.

Patricia C Dykes1, Ann Hurley, Margaret Cashen, Suzanne Bakken, Mary E Duffy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of health information technology (HIT) for the support of communication processes and data and information access in acute care settings is a relatively new phenomenon. A means of evaluating the impact of HIT in hospital settings is needed. The purpose of this research was to design and psychometrically evaluate the Impact of Health Information Technology scale (I-HIT). I-HIT was designed to measure the perception of nurses regarding the ways in which HIT influences interdisciplinary communication and workflow patterns and nurses' satisfaction with HIT applications and tools.
DESIGN: Content for a 43-item tool was derived from the literature, and supported theoretically by the Coiera model and by nurse informaticists. Internal consistency reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha was conducted on the 43-item scale to initiate the item reduction process. Items with an item total correlation of less than 0.35 were removed, leaving a total of 29 items. MEASUREMENTS: Item analysis, exploratory principal component analysis and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha were used to confirm the 29-item scale.
RESULTS: Principal components analysis with Varimax rotation produced a four-factor solution that explained 58.5% of total variance (general advantages, information tools to support information needs, information tools to support communication needs, and workflow implications). Internal consistency of the total scale was 0.95 and ranged from 0.80-0.89 for four subscales.
CONCLUSION: I-HIT demonstrated psychometric adequacy and is recommended to measure the impact of HIT on nursing practice in acute care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460123      PMCID: PMC2244896          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  20 in total

1.  When to use web-based surveys.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice.

Authors:  G Neale; M Woloshynowych; C Vincent
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence.

Authors:  M H Kearney
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  The impact of verbal communication on physician prescribing patterns in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Kay Martin; Loletta Carter; Donna Balciunas; Faranak Sotoudeh; Debbie Moore; Joanne Westerfield
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.140

5.  Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sutcliffe; Elizabeth Lewton; Marilynn M Rosenthal
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Marc Berg; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Online medical records: a decade of experience.

Authors:  C Safran; D Z Sands; D M Rind
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Clinical cognition and biomedical informatics: Issues of patient safety.

Authors:  Vimla L Patel; Leanne M Currie
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

9.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.

Authors:  L Lingard; S Espin; S Whyte; G Regehr; G R Baker; R Reznick; J Bohnen; B Orser; D Doran; E Grober
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

10.  Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department.

Authors:  Enrico W Coiera; Rohan A Jayasuriya; Jennifer Hardy; Aiveen Bannan; Max E C Thorpe
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electronic surveillance systems in infection prevention: organizational support, program characteristics, and user satisfaction.

Authors:  Patti G Grota; Patricia W Stone; Sarah Jordan; Monika Pogorzelska; Elaine Larson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  That's nice, but what does IT do? Evaluating the impact of bar coded medication administration by measuring changes in the process of care.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Roger L Brown; Samuel J Alper; Matthew C Scanlon; Neal R Patel; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.656

3.  Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior.

Authors:  Richard J Holden
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.