Literature DB >> 11353391

Comparative chromosome painting defines the high rate of karyotype changes between pigs and bovids.

L Frönicke1, J Wienberg.   

Abstract

Human and sheep chromosome-specific probes were used to construct comparative painting maps between the pig (Suiformes), cattle and sheep (Bovidae), and humans. Various yet unknown translocations were observed that would assist in a more complete reconstruction of homology maps of these species. The number of homologous segments that can be identified with sheep probes in the pig karyotype exceeds that described previously by chromosome painting between two non-primate mammals belonging to the same order. Sheep probes painted 62 segments on pig autosomes and delineated not only translocations, but also 9 inversions. All inversions were paracentric and indicate that these rearrangements may be characteristic for chromosomal changes in suiforms. Hybridizations of all sheep painting probes to cattle chromosomes confirmed the chromosome conservation in bovids. In addition, we observed a small translocation that was previously postulated from linkage mapping data, but was not yet described by physical mapping. The chromosome painting data are complemented with a map of available comparative gene mapping data between pig and sheep genomes. A detailed table listing the comparative gene mapping data between pig and cattle genomes is provided. The reanalysis of the pig karyotype with a new generation of human paint probes provides an update of the human/pig comparative genome map and demonstrates two new chromosome homologies. Seven conserved segments not yet identified by chromosome painting are also reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353391     DOI: 10.1007/s003350010288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  15 in total

1.  High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep.

Authors:  Filomena Adega; Raquel Chaves; Andrea Kofler; Paul R Krausman; Julio Masabanda; Johannes Wienberg; Henrique Guedes-Pinto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Cross-species chromosome painting among camel, cattle, pig and human: further insights into the putative Cetartiodactyla ancestral karyotype.

Authors:  Gabriel Balmus; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Patricia C M O'Brien; Elena S Alkalaeva; Beiyuan Fu; Julian A Skidmore; Twink Allen; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families.

Authors:  M Volleth; K G Heller; R A Pfeiffer; H Hameister
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  A high-resolution physical map of equine homologs of HSA19 shows divergent evolution compared with other mammals.

Authors:  Candice Brinkmeyer-Langford; Terje Raudsepp; Eun-Joon Lee; Glenda Goh; Alejandro A Schäffer; Richa Agarwala; Michelle L Wagner; Teruaki Tozaki; Loren C Skow; James E Womack; James R Mickelson; Bhanu P Chowdhary
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Multidirectional chromosome painting between the Hirola antelope (Damaliscus hunteri, Alcelaphini, Bovidae), sheep and human.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Lutz Frönicke; Henrique Guedes-Pinto; Johannes Wienberg
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Lutz Frönicke; Stephen J O'Brien; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Cross-species chromosome painting in Cetartiodactyla: reconstructing the karyotype evolution in key phylogenetic lineages.

Authors:  Anastasia I Kulemzina; Vladimir A Trifonov; Polina L Perelman; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Vitaly Volobuev; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Roscoe Stanyon; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  A meiotic linkage map of the silver fox, aligned and compared to the canine genome.

Authors:  Anna V Kukekova; Lyudmila N Trut; Irina N Oskina; Jennifer L Johnson; Svetlana V Temnykh; Anastasiya V Kharlamova; Darya V Shepeleva; Rimma G Gulievich; Svetlana G Shikhevich; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Gustavo D Aguirre; Gregory M Acland
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josefa González; José María Ranz; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting.

Authors:  Lutz Frönicke; Johannes Wienberg; Gary Stone; Lisa Adams; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.