Literature DB >> 19350402

Cross-species chromosome painting in Cetartiodactyla: reconstructing the karyotype evolution in key phylogenetic lineages.

Anastasia I Kulemzina1, Vladimir A Trifonov, Polina L Perelman, Nadezhda V Rubtsova, Vitaly Volobuev, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Roscoe Stanyon, Fengtang Yang, Alexander S Graphodatsky.   

Abstract

Recent molecular and morphological studies place Artiodactyla and Cetacea into the order Cetartiodactyla. Within the Cetartiodactyla such families as Bovidae, Cervidae, and Suidae are well studied by comparative chromosome painting, but many taxa that are crucial for understanding cetartiodactyl phylogeny remain poorly studied. Here we present the genome-wide comparative maps of five cetartiodactyl species obtained by chromosome painting with human and dromedary paint probes from four taxa: Cetacea, Hippopotamidae, Giraffidae, and Moschidae. This is the first molecular cytogenetic report on pilot whale, hippopotamus, okapi, and Siberian musk deer. Our results, when integrated with previously published comparative chromosome maps allow us to reconstruct the evolutionary pathway and rates of chromosomal rearrangements in Cetartiodactyla. We hypothesize that the putative cetartiodactyl ancestral karyotype (CAK) contained 25-26 pairs of autosomes, 2n = 52-54, and that the association of human chromosomes 8/9 could be a cytogenetic signature that unites non-camelid cetartiodactyls. There are no unambiguous cytogenetic landmarks that unite Hippopotamidae and Cetacea. If we superimpose chromosome rearrangements on the supertree generated by Price and colleagues, several homoplasy events are needed to explain cetartiodactyl karyotype evolution. Our results apparently favour a model of non-random breakpoints in chromosome evolution. Cetariodactyl karyotype evolution is characterized by alternating periods of low and fast rates in various lineages. The highest rates are found in Suina (Suidae+Tayasuidae) lineage (1.76 rearrangements per million years (R/My)) and the lowest in Cetaceans (0.07 R/My). Our study demonstrates that the combined use of human and camel paints is highly informative for revealing evolutionary karyotypic rearrangements among cetartiodactyl species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350402     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-009-9032-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  71 in total

1.  Phylogenetic study of complete cytochrome b genes in musk deer (genus Moschus) using museum samples.

Authors:  B Su; Y X Wang; H Lan; W Wang; Y Zhang
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  On the origin of the order Artiodactyla.

Authors:  K D Rose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cross-species chromosome painting among camel, cattle, pig and human: further insights into the putative Cetartiodactyla ancestral karyotype.

Authors:  Gabriel Balmus; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Patricia C M O'Brien; Elena S Alkalaeva; Beiyuan Fu; Julian A Skidmore; Twink Allen; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Indel evolution of mammalian introns and the utility of non-coding nuclear markers in eutherian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Conrad A Matthee; Geeta Eick; Sandi Willows-Munro; Claudine Montgelard; Amanda T Pardini; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates.

Authors:  M Shimamura; H Yasue; K Ohshima; H Abe; H Kato; T Kishiro; M Goto; I Munechika; N Okada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Phylogenetic relationships of artiodactyls and cetaceans as deduced from the comparison of cytochrome b and 12S rRNA mitochondrial sequences.

Authors:  C Montgelard; F M Catzeflis; E Douzery
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Phylogenomics of several deer species revealed by comparative chromosome painting with Chinese muntjac paints.

Authors:  Ling Huang; Jianxiang Chi; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Comparative map between the domestic pig and dog.

Authors:  L S Biltueva; F Yang; N V Vorobieva; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Refined genome-wide comparative map of the domestic horse, donkey and human based on cross-species chromosome painting: insight into the occasional fertility of mules.

Authors:  Fengtang Yang; Beiyuan Fu; Patricia C M O'Brien; Wenhui Nie; Oliver A Ryder; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

View more
  16 in total

1.  A cytogenetic and comparative map of camelid chromosome 36 and the minute in alpacas.

Authors:  Felipe Avila; Malorie P Baily; David A Merriwether; Vladimir A Trifonov; Jiři Rubes; Michelle A Kutzler; Renuka Chowdhary; Jan Janečka; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Chromosome painting in Tragulidae facilitates the reconstruction of Ruminantia ancestral karyotype.

Authors:  Anastasia I Kulemzina; Fengtang Yang; Vladimir A Trifonov; Oliver A Ryder; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the Amazon River dolphin Inia geoffrensis.

Authors:  Heidi L Bonifácio; Vera M F da Silva; Anthony R Martin; Eliana Feldberg
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals.

Authors:  Alexander S Graphodatsky; Vladimir A Trifonov; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana).

Authors:  Halina Cernohorska; Svatava Kubickova; Olga Kopecna; Anastasia I Kulemzina; Polina L Perelman; Frederick F B Elder; Terence J Robinson; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Development and application of camelid molecular cytogenetic tools.

Authors:  Felipe Avila; Pranab J Das; Michelle Kutzler; Elaine Owens; Polina Perelman; Jiri Rubes; Miroslav Hornak; Warren E Johnson; Terje Raudsepp
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Chromosomal rearrangements and karyotype evolution in carnivores revealed by chromosome painting.

Authors:  W Nie; J Wang; W Su; D Wang; A Tanomtong; P L Perelman; A S Graphodatsky; F Yang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Comparative chromosome painting of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) karyotypes with human and dromedary camel probes.

Authors:  Anastasia I Kulemzina; Polina L Perelman; Darya A Grafodatskaya; Trung T Nguyen; Mary Thompson; Melody E Roelke-Parker; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  The Ancestral Carnivore Karyotype As Substantiated by Comparative Chromosome Painting of Three Pinnipeds, the Walrus, the Steller Sea Lion and the Baikal Seal (Pinnipedia, Carnivora).

Authors:  Violetta R Beklemisheva; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Lemskaya; Anastasia I Kulemzina; Anastasia A Proskuryakova; Vladimir N Burkanov; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.