Literature DB >> 11353008

Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements.

R J van Beers1, D M Wolpert, P Haggard.   

Abstract

To localize a seen object, the CNS has to integrate the object's retinal location with the direction of gaze. Here we investigate this process by examining the localization of static objects during smooth pursuit eye movements. The normally experienced stability of the visual world during smooth pursuit suggests that the CNS essentially compensates for the eye movement when judging target locations. However, certain systematic localization errors are made, and we use these to study the process of sensorimotor integration. During an eye movement, a static object's image moves across the retina. Objects that produce retinal slip are known to be mislocalized: objects moving toward the fovea are seen too far on in their trajectory, whereas errors are much smaller for objects moving away from the fovea. These effects are usually studied by localizing the moving object relative to a briefly flashed one during fixation: moving objects are then mislocalized, but flashes are not. In our first experiment, we found that a similar differential mislocalization occurs for static objects relative to flashes during pursuit. This effect is not specific for horizontal pursuit but was also found in other directions. In a second experiment, we examined how this effect generalizes to positions outside the line of eye movement. We found that large localization errors were found in the entire hemifield ahead of the pursuit target and were predominantly aligned with the direction of eye movement. In a third experiment, we determined whether it is the flash or the static object that is mislocalized ahead of the pursuit target. In contrast to fixation conditions, we found that during pursuit it is the flash, not the static object, which is mislocalized. In a fourth experiment, we used egocentric localization to confirm this result. Our results suggest that the CNS compensates for the retinal localization errors to maintain position constancy for static objects during pursuit. This compensation is achieved in the process of sensorimotor integration of retinal and gaze signals: different retinal areas are integrated with different gaze signals to guarantee the stability of the visual world.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353008     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Multisensory space: from eye-movements to self-motion.

Authors:  Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Quickly tapping targets that are flashed during smooth pursuit reveals perceptual mislocalisations.

Authors:  Gerben Rotman; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Localization and motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum".

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Perisaccadic localization of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Masashi Nakatani; Hideyuki Ando; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of motion signals in hand movements.

Authors:  Borja Rodríguez-Herreros; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Angélique Gauch; Blandine Ulmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.