Literature DB >> 9398395

Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.

T P McNamara1, V A Diwadkar.   

Abstract

Six experiments investigated the limiting conditions on and the causes of asymmetries in estimates of euclidean distance. Participants estimated distances between locations on recently learned maps or between buildings on their college campus. Estimates between landmarks and neighboring nonlandmarks were often asymmetric, but estimates between other pairs of locations were typically symmetric. These and other results were inconsistent with the predictions of models that attribute asymmetries to stimulus or to retrieval bias. A contextual scaling model of asymmetry is proposed. According to this model, asymmetries in proximity judgments are caused by general principles of human memory and judgment: (a) Stimuli differ in the contexts they establish in working memory and (b) magnitude estimates are scaled by the context in which they are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398395     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  A basis for bias in geographical judgments.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Norman R Brown; Aaron P McGaffey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Spatial location judgments: a cross-national comparison of estimation bias in subjective North American geography.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Dennis D Kerkman; Norman R Brown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication.

Authors:  J M Plumert; T L Spalding; P Nichols-Whitehead
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

4.  Distance cognition in virtual environmental space: further investigations to clarify the route-angularity effect.

Authors:  Petra Jansen-Osmann; Gunnar Wiedenbauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-08-11

5.  Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Jason Dana; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-13

6.  Cross-cultural similarities and differences in North Americans' geographic location judgments.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Dennis D Kerkman; Norman R Brown; David Stea; Hector M Cappello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

7.  Location matters: why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks.

Authors:  Glenn Gunzelmann; John R Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

8.  Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory.

Authors:  Jacob L S Bellmund; William de Cothi; Tom A Ruiter; Matthias Nau; Caswell Barry; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-11-18

9.  The initial segment strategy: a heuristic for route selection.

Authors:  J N Bailenson; M S Shum; D H Uttal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

10.  Planning paths to multiple targets: memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving.

Authors:  J M Wiener; N N Ehbauer; H A Mallot
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.