Literature DB >> 11350228

Inner-sphere reorganization energy of iron-sulfur clusters studied with theoretical methods.

E Sigfridsson1, M H Olsson, U Ryde.   

Abstract

Models of several types of iron-sulfur clusters (e.g., Fe(4)S(4)(SCH(3))(4)(2-/3-/4-)) have been studied with the density functional B3LYP method and medium-sized basis sets. In a vacuum, the inner-sphere reorganization energies are 40, 76, 40, 62, 43, and 42 kJ/mol for the rubredoxin, [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin, Rieske, [4Fe-4S] ferredoxin, high-potential iron protein, and desulfoferrodoxin models, respectively. The first two types of clusters were also studied in the protein, where the reorganization energy was approximately halved. This change is caused by the numerous NH.S(Cys) hydrogen bonds to the negatively charged iron-sulfur cluster, giving rise to a polar local environment. The reorganization energy of the iron-sulfur clusters is low because the iron ions retain the same geometry and coordination number in both oxidation states. Cysteine ligands give approximately the same reorganization energy as imidazole, but they have the advantage of stabilizing a lower coordination number and giving more covalent bonds and therefore more effective electron-transfer paths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11350228     DOI: 10.1021/ic000752u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  22 in total

Review 1.  Focusing the view on nature's water-splitting catalyst.

Authors:  Samir Zein; Leonid V Kulik; Junko Yano; Jan Kern; Yulia Pushkar; Athina Zouni; Vittal K Yachandra; Wolfgang Lubitz; Frank Neese; Johannes Messinger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cluster-Dependent Charge-Transfer Dynamics in Iron-Sulfur Proteins.

Authors:  Ziliang Mao; Shu-Hao Liou; Nimesh Khadka; Francis E Jenney; David B Goodin; Lance C Seefeldt; Michael W W Adams; Stephen P Cramer; Delmar S Larsen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Oxidized and reduced [2Fe-2S] clusters from an iron(I) synthon.

Authors:  Megan E Reesbeck; Meghan M Rodriguez; William W Brennessel; Brandon Q Mercado; David Vinyard; Patrick L Holland
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Performance comparison of computational methods for modeling alpha-helical structures.

Authors:  Alexandru Lupan; Attila-Zsolt Kun; Francisco Carrascoza; Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  How are hydrogen bonds modified by metal binding?

Authors:  Charlotte Husberg; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  The iron-sulfur core in Rieske proteins is not symmetric.

Authors:  Md Ehesan Ali; Nisanth N Nair; Marius Retegan; Frank Neese; Volker Staemmler; Dominik Marx
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  Mechanism of the Primary Charge Transfer Reaction in the Cytochrome bc1 Complex.

Authors:  Angela M Barragan; Klaus Schulten; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Understanding rubredoxin redox sites by density functional theory studies of analogues.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Shuqiang Niu; Toshiko Ichiye
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Characterization of the [3Fe-4S](0/1+) cluster from the D14C variant of Pyrococcus furiosus ferredoxin via combined NRVS and DFT analyses.

Authors:  Lars Lauterbach; Leland B Gee; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Francis E Jenney; Saeed Kamali; Yoshitaka Yoda; Michael W W Adams; Stephen P Cramer
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.390

10.  Dynamical magnetostructural properties of Anabaena ferredoxin.

Authors:  Eduard Schreiner; Nisanth N Nair; Rodolphe Pollet; Volker Staemmler; Dominik Marx
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.