Literature DB >> 11348413

The effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age.

G MacKarem1, C A Roche, K S Hughes.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have provided information on risk factors for breast cancer. Gail and associates identified five risk factors using the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) population and developed a model to calculate a composite relative risk (RR). This model is commonly used to counsel women regarding their risk for breast cancer and was used by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) for eligibility for the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Because the BCDDP population was composed almost entirely of women 40 years of age or older, our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating the risk of breast cancer for women under 40 in the clinical setting. The Gail risk factors were assessed for 124 patients under the age of 40 treated for either ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer at the Lahey Hitchcock Medical Center between 1983 and 1995. The RR was calculated using the Gail model. For comparison, two cohorts of women under the age of 40 were used: 107 randomly selected patients who underwent a breast biopsy because of a benign condition and 129 nurses from our institution who responded to a questionnaire that included reproductive and family history information as used in the Gail model. The RR calculated was the RR that existed at the time of the surgical consultation for a suspicious breast lesion. The Tarone-Ware method was used to analyze statistical significance of differences between distribution. Contingency tables were analyzed using Miettinen's modification of Fisher's exact test. No differences were found between the median RR for all groups. Only 2 of the 124 patients with breast cancer had a RR of 5 or more (the RR required to enter the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial). The distribution of age at menarche (AGEMEN) was the same for each group. No difference was found for the distribution of age at first live birth (AGEFLB) between those with breast cancer and those with a benign biopsy or the control group. The number of breast biopsies (NBIOPS) was higher in patients with a benign breast biopsy. No difference was found in the distribution of number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer (NUMREL). Overall the Gail model failed to differentiate those women about to have cancer diagnosed from two control populations. The Gail model is not useful in identifying immediate risk of breast cancer in women under 40 and should not be used for that purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11348413     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007001034.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

1.  Captious certainties: makings, meanings and misreadings of consumer-oriented genetic testing.

Authors:  Norbert W Paul; Mita Banerjee; Susanne Michl
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-11-08

2.  Development of a Bayesian classifier for breast cancer risk stratification: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Christina Eberhardt; Leonard Henry; John Eberhardt; Eric A Elster; George E Peoples; Aviram Nissan; Craig D Shriver
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-03-29

3.  Breast cancer risk assessment in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban communities.

Authors:  Chyongchiou Jeng Lin; Bruce Block; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Mattie Woods; Edmund M Ricci; Keith H Morgenlander; Dwight E Heron
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Personalized medicine and access to health care: potential for inequitable access?

Authors:  Kelly A McClellan; Denise Avard; Jacques Simard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Consensus recommendations for advancing breast cancer: risk identification and screening in ethnically diverse younger women.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Thomas A Summers; John Eberhardt; Albert Cerussi; Warren Grundfest; Charles M Peterson; Michael Brazaitis; Elizabeth Krupinski; Harold Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged 35-50 years: impact of including sex hormone concentrations in the Gail model.

Authors:  Tess V Clendenen; Wenzhen Ge; Karen L Koenig; Yelena Afanasyeva; Claudia Agnoli; Louise A Brinton; Farbod Darvishian; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Mengling Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  The Application of Gail Model to Predict the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer among Jordanian Women.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Luna Zaru; Ahmed Badheeb; Shadi Hijjawi
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.