Literature DB >> 17668640

Breast cancer risk assessment in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban communities.

Chyongchiou Jeng Lin1, Bruce Block, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Mattie Woods, Edmund M Ricci, Keith H Morgenlander, Dwight E Heron.   

Abstract

During 2005, a risk assessment tool based on the Gail model was used to calculate the five-year risk of developing breast cancer for 445 women who live in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban communities in western Pennsylvania and who attended health fairs and other community-sponsored activities. This tool allowed us to evaluate each woman and advise her of her risks in a process lasting 15-20 minutes. Of the 445 women, 71.7% were black and 21.6% had a higher than average risk. The proportion of white women at high risk was significantly greater than the proportion of black women at high risk (33.3% vs. 16.9%; P < 0.01). The Gail model assessment tool for use in low-income and minority populations holds promise because it is noninvasive, is easy to use and provides immediate data about risk. This risk communication may help encourage minority and low-income women to receive screening mammography. It has the potential to improve breast cancer screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668640      PMCID: PMC2574352     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  23 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The risk of cancer risk prediction: "What is my risk of getting breast cancer"?

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Impacting cultural attitudes in African-American women to decrease breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Donald R Lannin; Holly F Mathews; Jim Mitchell; Melvin S Swanson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; N Pal; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic.

Authors:  David M Euhus; A Marilyn Leitch; James F Huth; George N Peters
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  The effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age.

Authors:  G MacKarem; C A Roche; K S Hughes
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community.

Authors:  Soji F Oluwole; Ayoola O Ali; Albert Adu; Brenda P Blane; Barbara Barlow; Ruben Oropeza; Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Cancer of the breast in poor black women.

Authors:  H P Freeman; T J Wasfie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Elizabeth Fries; Donna McClish; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

Review 10.  Breast cancer risk assessment models: applicability to African-American women.

Authors:  Melissa L Bondy; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of common risk factors and validation of the Gail model for breast cancer: A hospital-based study from Western India.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Vinit Singh; Garima Mehta
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2020-04-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.