Literature DB >> 11347810

Bipolar or rectified chromatic detection mechanisms?

M J Sankeralli1, K T Mullen.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that human color vision is based on two types of cone-opponent mechanism, one differencing L and M cone types (loosely termed "red-green"), and the other differencing S with the L and M cones (loosely termed "blue-yellow"). The traditional view of the early processing of human color vision suggests that each of these cone-opponent mechanisms respond in a bipolar fashion to signal two opponent colors (red vs. green, blue vs. yellow). An alternative possibility is that each cone-opponent response, as well as the luminance response, is rectified, so producing separable signals for each pole (red, green, blue, yellow, light, and dark). In this study, we use psychophysical noise masking to determine whether the rectified model applies to detection by the postreceptoral mechanisms. We measured the contrast-detection thresholds of six test stimuli (red, green, blue, yellow, light, and dark), corresponding to the two poles of each of the three postreceptoral mechanisms. For each test, we determined whether noise presented to the cross pole had the same masking effect as noise presented to the same pole (e.g. comparing masking of luminance increments by luminance decrement noise (cross pole) and luminance increment noise (same pole)). To avoid stimulus cancellation, the test and mask were presented asynchronously in a "sandwich" arrangement (mask-test-mask). For the six test stimuli, we observed that noise masks presented to the cross pole did not raise the detection thresholds of the test, whereas noise presented to the same pole produced a substantial masking. This result suggests that each color signal (red, green, blue, and yellow) and luminance signal, (light and dark) is subserved by a separable mechanism. We suggest that the cone-opponent and luminance mechanisms have similar physiological bases, since a functional separation of the processing of cone increments and cone decrements could underlie both the separation of the luminance system into ON and OFF pathways as well as the splitting of the cone-opponent mechanisms into separable color poles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11347810     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801181125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  6 in total

1.  The gap effect is exaggerated in parafovea.

Authors:  Marina Danilova; John Mollon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Macaque retina contains an S-cone OFF midget pathway.

Authors:  Karl Klug; Steve Herr; Ivy Tran Ngo; Peter Sterling; Stan Schein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Color appearance model incorporating contrast adaptation - implications for individual differences in color vision.

Authors:  Kevin A G Smet; Michael A Webster; Lorne A Whitehead
Journal:  Color Res Appl       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.668

4.  Combining S-cone and luminance signals adversely affects discrimination of objects within backgrounds.

Authors:  Ben J Jennings; Konstantinos Tsattalios; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A potential mechanism for compensation in the blue-yellow visual channel.

Authors:  Nicole T Stringham; Dean Sabatinelli; James M Stringham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Color Discrimination Is Affected by Modulation of Luminance Noise in Pseudoisochromatic Stimuli.

Authors:  Iñaki Cormenzana Méndez; Andrés Martín; Teaire L Charmichael; Mellina M Jacob; Eliza M C B Lacerda; Bruno D Gomes; Malinda E C Fitzgerald; Dora F Ventura; Luiz C L Silveira; Beatriz M O'Donell; Givago S Souza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.