Literature DB >> 34334884

Color appearance model incorporating contrast adaptation - implications for individual differences in color vision.

Kevin A G Smet1, Michael A Webster2, Lorne A Whitehead3.   

Abstract

Color appearance models use standard color matching functions to derive colorimetric information from spectral radiometric measurements of a visual environment, and they process that information to predict color perceptual attributes such as hue, chroma and lightness. That processing is usually done by equations with fixed numerical coefficients that were predetermined to yield optimal agreement for a given standard observer. Here we address the well-known fact that, among color-normal observers, there are significant differences of color matching functions. These cause disagreements between individuals as to whether certain colors match, an important effect that is often called observer metamerism. Yet how these individual sensitivity differences translate into differences in perceptual metrics is not fully addressed by many appearance models. It might seem that appearance could be predicted by substituting an individual's color matching functions into an otherwise-unchanged color appearance model, but this is problematic because the model's coefficients were not optimized for the new observer. Here we explore a solution guided by the idea that processes of adaptation in the visual system tend to compensate color perception for differences in cone responses and consequent color matching functions. For this purpose, we developed a simple color appearance model that uses only a few numerical coefficients, yet accurately predicts the perceptual attributes of Munsell samples under a selected standard lighting condition. We then added a feedback loop to automatically adjust the model coefficients, in response to switching between cone fundamentals simulating different observers and color matching functions. This adjustment is intended to model long term contrast adaptation in the vision system by maintaining average overall color contrast levels. Incorporating this adaptation principle into color appearance models could allow better assessments of displays and illumination systems, to help improve color appearances for most observers.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34334884      PMCID: PMC8320589          DOI: 10.1002/col.22620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Color Res Appl        ISSN: 0361-2317            Impact factor:   1.668


  64 in total

1.  Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults.

Authors:  Jay Neitz; Joseph Carroll; Yasuki Yamauchi; Maureen Neitz; David R Williams
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Color constancy.

Authors:  David H Foster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Aging of the human lens.

Authors:  J Pokorny; V C Smith; M Lutze
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Factors underlying individual differences in the color matches of normal observers.

Authors:  M A Webster; D I MacLeod
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Suprathreshold contrast response in normal and anomalous trichromats.

Authors:  Kenneth Knoblauch; Brennan Marsh-Armstrong; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Cardinal directions of color space.

Authors:  J Krauskopf; D R Williams; D W Heeley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Simulations of adaptation and color appearance in observers with varying spectral sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Igor Juricevic; Kyle C McDermott
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Color signals through dorsal and ventral visual pathways.

Authors:  Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 9.  Probing the functions of contextual modulation by adapting images rather than observers.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Individual Colorimetric Observer Model.

Authors:  Yuta Asano; Mark D Fairchild; Laurent Blondé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Color difference between the vita classical shade guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique.

Authors:  Franciele Floriani; Bryce-Arielle Brandfon; Nathalie J Sawczuk; Guilherme-Carpena Lopes; Mateus-Garcia Rocha; Dayane Oliveira
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Using Smooth Metamers to Estimate Color Appearance Metrics for Diverse Color-Normal Observers.

Authors:  Kevin A G Smet; Michael A Webster; Lorne A Whitehead
Journal:  Color Res Appl       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 1.668

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.