Literature DB >> 11341713

Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.

S Peer, U Neitzel, S M Giacomuzzi, R Peer, E Gassner, I Steingruber, W Jaschke.   

Abstract

A contrast detail analysis was performed to compare perception of low-contrast details on X-ray images derived from digital storage phosphor radiography and from a flat panel detector system based on a cesium iodide/amorphous silicon matrix. The CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to perform a comparative contrast detail analysis of a clinical storage phosphor radiography system and an indirect type digital flat panel detector unit. Images were acquired at exposure levels comparable to film speeds of 50/100/200/400 and 800. Four observers evaluated a total of 50 films with respect to the threshold contrast for each detail size. The numbers of correctly identified objects were determined for all image subsets. The overall results show that low-contrast detail perception with digital flat panel detector images is better than with state of the art storage phosphor screens. This is especially true for the low-exposure setting, where a nearly 10% higher correct observation ratio is reached. Given its high detective quantum efficiency the digital flat panel technology based on the cesium iodide scintillator/amorphous silicon matrix is best suited for detection of low-contrast detail structures, which shows its high potential for clinical imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341713     DOI: 10.1109/42.918474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  2 in total

1.  Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.

Authors:  Michael Gruber; Martin Uffmann; Michael Weber; Mathias Prokop; Csilla Balassy; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.