Literature DB >> 11341084

A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation.

H F Tse1, C P Lau, S K Leung.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique for implantation of a pacemaker or ICD and to determine the causes of failure of cephalic vein cutdown. In consecutive patients who underwent pacemaker or ICD implants, a modified cephalic vein guidewire technique was performed. This technique was attempted in 289 pacemaker implants and 26 ICD implants (155 men, 160 women; mean age 74 +/- 10 years). The success rate for implantation of a single chamber and a dual chamber device by using this technique alone was 84% (54/64) and 74% (185/251), respectively (P = 0.10). In an additional 7% of patients with dual chamber implant, the cephalic vein can be used for passage of the ventricular lead. A cephalic venogram was required in 82 patients and facilitated the passage of the guidewire in 62 (79%) of them. No complication related to vascular access was observed with this technique. This technique failed in 54 (17%) of 315 patients due to (1) failure of cephalic vein isolation (48%), (2) venous stenosis (24%), or (3) venous torturosity or anomalies (28%). There were no significant differences in the patient's age, sex, type of device, and the fluoroscopic time for lead placement between patients with or without successful lead placement using this technique (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, a simple modification of the cephalic vein guidewire technique together with venography has facilitated the placement of leads during pacemaker and ICD implant. This technique is safe and applicable in the majority of patients and avoids the risk of subclavian puncture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341084     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Pre-procedure duplex ultrasonography to assist cephalic vein isolation in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Jan-Yow Chen; Kuan-Cheng Chang; Yu-Chin Lin; Hsiang-Tai Chou; Jui-Sung Hung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Pneumothorax resulting from subclavian puncture: a complication of permanent pacemaker lead implantation.

Authors:  J C J Res; J A de Priester; A A van Lier; C L J M van Engelen; P N A Bronzwaer; P-H Tan; M Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Feasibility and accuracy of pre-procedure imaging of the proximal cephalic vein by duplex ultrasonography in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Jan-Yow Chen; Kuan-Cheng Chang; Yu-Chin Lin; Hsiang-Tai Chou; Jui-Sung Hung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Left ventricular lead placement with over-the-wire technique for right ventricular pacing in a patient with distorted vessels.

Authors:  Ahmad Yaminisharif; Mohammad Javad Alemzadeh-Ansari; Akbar Shafiee
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

5.  Clinical predictors of successful cephalic vein access for implantation of endocardial leads.

Authors:  Bradley P Knight; Kristen Curlett; Hakan Oral; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; S Adam Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Triple lead cephalic versus subclavian vein approach in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.

Authors:  Julia Vogler; Anne Geisler; Nils Gosau; Samer Hakmi; Stephan Willems; Tienush Rassaf; Reza Wakili; Elif Kaya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.