Literature DB >> 11337683

Contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical practice assessment in 300 consecutive patients.

A J Rainbird1, S L Mulvagh, J K Oh, R B McCully, K W Klarich, C Shub, D W Mahoney, P A Pellikka.   

Abstract

In this study we compared non-contrast imaging with contrast imaging of the left ventricle during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Wall segment visualization, image quality, and confidence of interpretation were determined with and without the use of intravenous Optison, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent, in 300 consecutive patients undergoing rest and peak DSE. At rest and at peak stress, the percentage of wall segments visualized, image quality, and confidence of interpretation were better with contrast compared with non-contrast imaging. No significant decrease was seen in wall segment visualization, image quality, or confidence of interpretation from rest to peak stress in images obtained with contrast, unlike the images obtained without contrast from rest to peak stress. The use of the intravenous echocardiographic contrast agent Optison during DSE significantly improved wall segment visualization and image quality at rest and at peak stress, resulting in improved confidence of interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11337683     DOI: 10.1067/mje.2001.111264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  21 in total

1.  Contrast echocardiography for left ventricular opacification.

Authors:  J Timperley; A R J Mitchell; H Becher
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  The controversy regarding contrast echocardiography and how it affects patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel L Wagner; Julio E Pérez; Linda R Peterson; Ravi Rasalingam
Journal:  J Cardiometab Syndr       Date:  2008

Review 4.  [Assessment of systolic function in patients with poor echogenicity: echocardiographic methods].

Authors:  F Weidemann; D Liu; M Niemann; S Herrmann; H Hu; P D Gaudron; G Ertl; K Hu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Adrian Chong; Brian Haluska; Sudhir Wahi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-06

Review 6.  Contrast echocardiography for right-sided heart conditions: case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Harvinder Arora; Salim S Virani; Leo Simpson; Raymond F Stainback
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Principles of transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Anita C Boyd; Nelson B Schiller; Liza Thomas
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Effect of stress echocardiography testing on changes in cardiovascular risk behaviors in postmenopausal women: a prospective survey study.

Authors:  Francesca Mantovani; Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Victoria Zysek; Susan Eifert-Rain; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Limitations and potential clinical application on contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Elisa Modonesi; Manrico Balbi; Gian Paolo Bezante
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.