Literature DB >> 24932797

Effect of stress echocardiography testing on changes in cardiovascular risk behaviors in postmenopausal women: a prospective survey study.

Francesca Mantovani1, Sahar S Abdelmoneim, Victoria Zysek, Susan Eifert-Rain, Sharon L Mulvagh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of contrast stress echocardiography (CSE) testing results on cardiovascular (CV) risk behaviors in postmenopausal women presenting with chest pain symptoms. This was a substudy of the Stress Echocardiography in Menopausal Women at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease (SMART) trial.
METHODS: From 2004 to 2007, 366 women (mean age 54.4 ± 5.5 years, range 40-65; body mass index (BMI) 31.4 ± 6.68; Caucasian in 95%) completed CSE and were invited to participate in the Women's Heart Clinic Risk Assessment Questionnaire (WHCRAQ survey) at the time of CSE and after 2 years. Of the 366, 203 (55%) postmenopausal women completed both the baseline and 2-year follow-up surveys (age 61 ± 5 years; Framingham risk score 6 ± 4%, 81% treadmill CSE, 19% dobutamine CSE). WHCRAQ assessed medical history, hormone therapy (HT), and CV risk behaviors (cigarette smoking history, including current smoking and mean cigarettes smoked per day; physical activity or exercise, including mean exercise minutes per week; and dietary fat intake, alcohol intake, and mean alcohol drinks per week). Abnormal CSE was defined as a new or worsening stress wall motion abnormality. Post-CSE changes in CV risk behaviors were determined by comparing baseline versus 2-year data.
RESULTS: Of the 203 women who completed the survey at baseline and 2-year CSE, 29 were excluded to avoid confounding effect (coronary angiography [CA] was performed during follow-up). Of 174 women (55% hypertensive, 10% diabetic, 76% hyperlipidemic, and 25% on HT), CSE was abnormal in 10%. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different in normal versus abnormal CSE, apart from diabetes (8% vs. 24%, p=0.04). Slightly more women with normal CSE were taking HT than not (27% vs. 12%, p=0.19). CV risk behaviors that were different in normal versus abnormal CSE included current smoking, alcohol drinks per week, and higher fat diet (8% vs. 24%, p=0.03; 2.5 ± 3.5 vs. 1.94±5.2, p=0.031; and 92% vs. 76%, p=0.03, respectively). Cigarette smoking decreased (mean difference of -1.5 cigarettes per day, p=0.014) in the abnormal-CSE group, whereas number of alcohol drinks per week increased (mean difference +0.38, p=0.009) in the normal-CSE group.
CONCLUSION: We observed an association of lifestyle changes with CSE test results in postmenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932797      PMCID: PMC4088348          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  20 in total

1.  Contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical practice assessment in 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  A J Rainbird; S L Mulvagh; J K Oh; R B McCully; K W Klarich; C Shub; D W Mahoney; P A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Andrew Arai; Matthew J Budoff; Scott D Flamm; W Gregory Hundley; Thomas H Marwick; Lori Mosca; Ayan R Patel; Miguel A Quinones; Rita F Redberg; Kathryn A Taubert; Allen J Taylor; Gregory S Thomas; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Improved smoking cessation in smokers given ultrasound photographs of their own atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Pascal Bovet; François Perret; Jacques Cornuz; Jessy Quilindo; Fred Paccaud
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Impact of electron beam tomography, with or without case management, on motivation, behavioral change, and cardiovascular risk profile: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick G O'Malley; Irwin M Feuerstein; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A randomized cross-over study for evaluation of the effect of image optimization with contrast on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography in coronary artery disease The OPTIMIZE Trial.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Plana; Issam A Mikati; Hisham Dokainish; Nasser Lakkis; John Abukhalil; Robert Davis; Brian C Hetzell; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03

7.  Risk factor control for coronary artery disease secondary prevention in large randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael E Farkouh; William E Boden; Vera Bittner; Victoria Muratov; Pamela Hartigan; May Ogdie; Marnie Bertolet; Shiny Mathewkutty; Koon Teo; David J Maron; Sanjum S Sethi; Michael Domanski; Robert L Frye; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Melda S Dolan; Simil S Gala; Saritha Dodla; Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Feng Xie; David Cloutier; Michelle Bierig; Sharon L Mulvagh; Thomas R Porter; Arthur J Labovitz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The impact of carotid plaque screening on motivation for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodondi; Reto Auer; Patrick J Devine; Patrick G O'Malley; Daniel Hayoz; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Information given to postmenopausal women on coronary computed tomography may influence cardiac risk reduction efforts.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lederman; Jennifer Ballard; Valentine Y Njike; Laurie Margolies; David L Katz
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.