J Baele1, E Dusseldorp, S Maes. 1. Leuven University Center for Cancer Prevention, Leuven, Belgium. jo.baele@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate aspects of adolescents' condom use self-efficacy that affect their intended and actual condom use. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-four male and female sexually experienced and inexperienced adolescents with a mean age of 17.0 years filled out a questionnaire concerning condom use self-efficacy and intended and actual condom use. Specific condom use self-efficacy scales were constructed from 37 items on the basis of a principal component analysis. The effect of self-efficacy, both as a global measure and in terms of specific scales, on condom use intention and consistency was assessed using multiple hierarchic regression analyses. RESULTS: Six specific self-efficacy scales were constructed: Technical Skills, Image Confidence, Emotion Control, Purchase, Assertiveness, and Sexual Control. In sexually inexperienced adolescents, global self-efficacy explained 48%, the six self-efficacy scales 30%, and both together 51% of the variance in intention, after statistical control for gender, age, and education level. In the sexually experienced sample, this was 40%, 50%, and 57% for intention, and 23%, 29%, and 33% for consistency of condom use. Significant predictors of intention in the final model were gender, age, global self-efficacy and purchasing skills in the inexperienced sample, and global self-efficacy, emotion control, assertiveness, image confidence, and sexual control in the experienced sample, whereas gender, age, global self-efficacy, emotion control, assertiveness, and purchase predicted consistency of condom use in the experienced sample. CONCLUSIONS: Condom use self-efficacy is a multidimensional construct. Intended and actual condom use in adolescents are best predicted by self-efficacy measures that include both global and relevant specific aspects of condom use.
PURPOSE: To investigate aspects of adolescents' condom use self-efficacy that affect their intended and actual condom use. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-four male and female sexually experienced and inexperienced adolescents with a mean age of 17.0 years filled out a questionnaire concerning condom use self-efficacy and intended and actual condom use. Specific condom use self-efficacy scales were constructed from 37 items on the basis of a principal component analysis. The effect of self-efficacy, both as a global measure and in terms of specific scales, on condom use intention and consistency was assessed using multiple hierarchic regression analyses. RESULTS: Six specific self-efficacy scales were constructed: Technical Skills, Image Confidence, Emotion Control, Purchase, Assertiveness, and Sexual Control. In sexually inexperienced adolescents, global self-efficacy explained 48%, the six self-efficacy scales 30%, and both together 51% of the variance in intention, after statistical control for gender, age, and education level. In the sexually experienced sample, this was 40%, 50%, and 57% for intention, and 23%, 29%, and 33% for consistency of condom use. Significant predictors of intention in the final model were gender, age, global self-efficacy and purchasing skills in the inexperienced sample, and global self-efficacy, emotion control, assertiveness, image confidence, and sexual control in the experienced sample, whereas gender, age, global self-efficacy, emotion control, assertiveness, and purchase predicted consistency of condom use in the experienced sample. CONCLUSIONS: Condom use self-efficacy is a multidimensional construct. Intended and actual condom use in adolescents are best predicted by self-efficacy measures that include both global and relevant specific aspects of condom use.
Authors: Jennifer N Sayles; Audrey Pettifor; Mitchell D Wong; Catherine MacPhail; Sung-Jae Lee; Ellen Hendriksen; Helen V Rees; Thomas Coates Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ellen Setsuko Hendriksen; Audrey Pettifor; Sung-Jae Lee; Thomas J Coates; Helen V Rees Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joseph L Fava; Jacob J van den Berg; Rochelle K Rosen; Liz Salomon; Sara Vargas; Anna L Christensen; Megan Pinkston; Kathleen M Morrow Journal: Sex Health Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.706