Literature DB >> 23806676

Measuring self-efficacy to use vaginal microbicides: the Microbicide Use Self-Efficacy instrument.

Joseph L Fava1, Jacob J van den Berg, Rochelle K Rosen, Liz Salomon, Sara Vargas, Anna L Christensen, Megan Pinkston, Kathleen M Morrow.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Objectives To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Microbicide Use Self-Efficacy (MUSE) instrument and to examine correlates of self-efficacy to use vaginal microbicides among a sample of racially and ethnically diverse women living in the north-eastern United States.
METHODS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic methods were used to explore and determine the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the MUSE instrument. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relationships of the MUSE instrument to key sexual behaviour, partner communication, relationship and psychosocial variables.
RESULTS: Two dimensions of self-efficacy to use microbicides were psychometrically validated and identified as 'Adherence and Access' and 'Situational Challenges.' The two four-item subscales measuring Adherence and Access and Situational Challenges had reliability coefficients of 0.78 and 0.85, respectively. Correlates of the two measures were tested at a Bonferroni-adjusted α level of P=0.001, and 19 of 43 variables analysed were found to significantly relate to Adherence and Access, whereas 16 of 43 variables were significantly related to Situational Challenges. Of the 35 significant relationships, 32 were in the domains of partner communication, partner relationships, and behavioural and psychosocial variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The MUSE instrument demonstrated strong internal validity, reliability and initial construct validity. The MUSE instrument can be a useful tool in capturing the multidimensional nature of self-efficacy to use microbicides among diverse populations of women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806676      PMCID: PMC4563864          DOI: 10.1071/SH13013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  22 in total

1.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer's MAP test.

Authors:  B P O'Connor
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-08

2.  Factors related to self-efficacy for use of condoms and birth control among women at risk for HIV infection.

Authors:  J L Lauby; S Semaan; A O'Connell; B Person; A Vogel
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2001

3.  Correct condom application among African-American adolescent females: the relationship to perceived self-efficacy and the association to confirmed STDs.

Authors:  R Crosby; R J DiClemente; G M Wingood; C Sionean; B K Cobb; K Harrington; S Davies; E W Hook; M K Oh
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Condom use self-efficacy: effect on intended and actual condom use in adolescents.

Authors:  J Baele; E Dusseldorp; S Maes
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Action control and situational risks in the prevention of HIV and STIs: individual, dyadic, and social influences on consistent condom use in a university population.

Authors:  Gary R Svenson; Per-Olof Ostergren; Juan Merlo; Lennart Råstam
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-12

6.  Perceived condom use self-efficacy among at-risk women.

Authors:  Claire E Sterk; Hugh Klein; Kirk W Elifson
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2003-06

7.  Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women.

Authors:  Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Contraceptive self-efficacy in college women.

Authors:  L B Heinrich
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 gel for the prevention of HIV infection in women.

Authors:  Salim S Abdool Karim; Barbra A Richardson; Gita Ramjee; Irving F Hoffman; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Taha Taha; Muzala Kapina; Lisa Maslankowski; Anne Coletti; Albert Profy; Thomas R Moench; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Benoît Mâsse; Sharon L Hillier; Lydia Soto-Torres
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  5 in total

1.  Designing preclinical perceptibility measures to evaluate topical vaginal gel formulations: relating user sensory perceptions and experiences to formulation properties.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Joseph L Fava; Rochelle K Rosen; Sara Vargas; Julia G Shaw; E Milu Kojic; Patrick F Kiser; David R Friend; David F Katz
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  The Role of Sexual Health Professionals in Developing a Shared Concept of Risky Sexual Behavior as it Relates to HIV Transmission.

Authors:  Bridgette M Brawner; Kamila A Alexander; Ehriel F Fannin; Jillian L Baker; Zupenda M Davis
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.462

3.  Psychometric Properties and Validity of a Multi-dimensional Risk Perception Scale Developed in the Context of a Microbicide Acceptability Study.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Joseph L Fava; Lawrence Severy; Rochelle K Rosen; Liz Salomon; Lawrence Shulman; Kate Morrow Guthrie
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 4.  Health behavior change models for HIV prevention and AIDS care: practical recommendations for a multi-level approach.

Authors:  Michelle R Kaufman; Flora Cornish; Rick S Zimmerman; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  User evaluations offer promise for pod-intravaginal ring as a drug delivery platform: A mixed methods study of acceptability and use experiences.

Authors:  Kate M Guthrie; Rochelle K Rosen; Sara E Vargas; Melissa L Getz; Lauren Dawson; Melissa Guillen; Jaime J Ramirez; Marc M Baum; Kathleen L Vincent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.