Literature DB >> 11335190

Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals.

H M Miedema1, C G Oudshoorn.   

Abstract

We present a model of the distribution of noise annoyance with the mean varying as a function of the noise exposure. Day-night level (DNL) and day-evening-night level (DENL) were used as noise descriptors. Because the entire annoyance distribution has been modeled, any annoyance measure that summarizes this distribution can be calculated from the model. We fitted the model to data from noise annoyance studies for aircraft, road traffic, and railways separately. Polynomial approximations of relationships implied by the model for the combinations of the following exposure and annoyance measures are presented: DNL or DENL, and percentage "highly annoyed" (cutoff at 72 on a scale of 0-100), percentage "annoyed" (cutoff at 50 on a scale of 0-100), or percentage (at least) "a little annoyed" (cutoff at 28 on a scale of 0-100). These approximations are very good, and they are easier to use for practical calculations than the model itself, because the model involves a normal distribution. Our results are based on the same data set that was used earlier to establish relationships between DNL and percentage highly annoyed. In this paper we provide better estimates of the confidence intervals due to the improved model of the relationship between annoyance and noise exposure. Moreover, relationships using descriptors other than DNL and percentage highly annoyed, which are presented here, have not been established earlier on the basis of a large dataset.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11335190      PMCID: PMC1240282          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  3 in total

1.  Community reaction to aircraft noise: time-of-day penalty and tradeoff between levels of overflights.

Authors:  H M Miedema; H Vos; R G de Jong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.

Authors:  H M Miedema; H Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance.

Authors:  T J Schultz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total
  104 in total

Review 1.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health.

Authors:  Alan Lex Brown; Irene van Kamp
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Noise levels associated with urban land use.

Authors:  Gavin King; Marek Roland-Mieszkowski; Timothy Jason; Daniel G Rainham
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Comprehensive approach for the development of traffic noise prediction model for Jaipur city.

Authors:  Sheetal Agarwal; B L Swami
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Short-term annoyance from nocturnal aircraft noise exposure: results of the NORAH and STRAIN sleep studies.

Authors:  Julia Quehl; Uwe Müller; Franco Mendolia
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Air pollution and incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in black women living in Los Angeles.

Authors:  Patricia F Coogan; Laura F White; Michael Jerrett; Robert D Brook; Jason G Su; Edmund Seto; Richard Burnett; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Non-auditory Effects of Noise Pollution on Health: A Perspective.

Authors:  Roopak Visakan Raja; Valli Rajasekaran; Gurumani Sriraman
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-29

7.  Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; David Welch; Kim N Dirks; Renata Mathews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Health status as a potential effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and incidence of ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  W Babisch; H Ising; J E J Gallacher
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Association between ambient noise exposure and school performance of children living in an urban area: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Sophie Pujol; Jean-Pierre Levain; Hélène Houot; Rémy Petit; Marc Berthillier; Jérôme Defrance; Joseph Lardies; Cyril Masselot; Frédéric Mauny
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 10.  Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Beat Schäffer; Reto Pieren; Kurt Heutschi; Jean Marc Wunderli; Stefan Becker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.