Literature DB >> 11334809

Phasic modulation of corticomotor excitability during passive movement of the upper limb: effects of movement frequency and muscle specificity.

G N Lewis1, W D Byblow, R G Carson.   

Abstract

Modulations in the excitability of spinal reflex pathways during passive rhythmic movements of the lower limb have been demonstrated by a number of previous studies [4]. Less emphasis has been placed on the role of supraspinal pathways during passive movement, and on tasks involving the upper limb. In the present study, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to subjects while undergoing passive flexion-extension movements of the contralateral wrist. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and abductor pollicus brevis (APB) muscles were recorded. Stimuli were delivered in eight phases of the movement cycle during three different frequencies of movement. Evidence of marked modulations in pathway excitability was found in the MEP amplitudes of the FCR muscle, with responses inhibited and facilitated from static values in the extension and flexion phases, respectively. The results indicated that at higher frequencies of movement there was greater modulation in pathway excitability. Paired-pulse TMS (sub-threshold conditioning) at short interstimulus intervals revealed modulations in the extent of inhibition in MEP amplitude at high movement frequencies. In the APB muscle, there was some evidence of phasic modulations of response amplitude, although the effects were less marked than those observed in FCR. It is speculated that these modulatory effects are mediated via Ia afferent pathways and arise as a consequence of the induced forearm muscle shortening and lengthening. Although the level at which this input influences the corticomotoneuronal pathway is difficult to discern, a contribution from cortical regions is suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11334809     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02369-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  22 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent effects of muscle tendon vibration on corticospinal excitability: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Steyvers; O Levin; S M Verschueren; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of interhemispheric inhibition during passive movement of the upper limb reflects changes in motor cortical excitability.

Authors:  Shane A Warbrooke; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulatory effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on skeletal muscle tone in healthy subjects: stabilization of the elbow joint.

Authors:  Albrecht Struppler; Bernhard Angerer; Christian Gündisch; Peter Havel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Post-exercise depression in corticomotor excitability after dynamic movement: a general property of fatiguing and non-fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  W P Teo; J P Rodrigues; F L Mastaglia; G W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Control of wrist position and muscle relaxation by shifting spatial frames of reference for motoneuronal recruitment: possible involvement of corticospinal pathways.

Authors:  Helli Raptis; Liziane Burtet; Robert Forget; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The potential neural mechanisms of acute indirect vibration.

Authors:  Darryl J Cochrane
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Benjamin Pasquet; Alain Martin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Daniel Abdel-Malek; Christopher M F Bunce; Michael W R Holmes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Cortical excitability following passive movement.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2018-11-30

10.  Arm posture-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability are largely spinal in origin.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo; Gabriel S Trajano; Benjamin K Barry; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.