BACKGROUND: The enhanced vulnerability of women to develop alcohol-related diseases may be due to their higher blood alcohol levels after drinking, but the mechanism for this effect is debated. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy volunteers of both genders drank 0.3 g of ethanol/kg of body weight (as 5%, 10%, or 40% solutions) postprandially. Blood alcohol concentrations were monitored by breath analysis and compared with those after intravenous infusion of the same dose. First-pass metabolism was quantified (using Michaelis-Menten kinetics) as the route-dependent difference in the amount of ethanol reaching the systemic blood. Gastric emptying was assessed by nuclear scanning after intake of 300 microCurie of technetium-labeled diethylene triamine pentacetic acid in 10% ethanol. The activities of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes were assessed in 58 gastric biopsies, using preferred substrates for gamma-ADH (acetaldehyde) and for final sigma-ADH (m-nitrobenzaldehyde) and a specific reaction of chi-ADH (glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase). RESULTS: Women had less first-pass metabolism than men when given 10% or 40%, but not 5%, alcohol. This was associated with lower gastric chi-ADH activity; its low affinity for ethanol could explain the greater gender difference in first-pass metabolism with high rather than with low concentrations of imbibed alcohol. Alcohol gastric emptying was 42% slower and hepatic oxidation was 10% higher in women. A 7.3% smaller volume of alcohol distribution contributed to the higher ethanol levels in women, but it did not account for the route-dependent effects. CONCLUSIONS: The gender difference in alcohol levels is due mainly to a smaller gastric metabolism in females (because of a significantly lesser activity of chi-ADH), rather than to differences in gastric emptying or in hepatic oxidation of ethanol. The concentration-dependency of these effects may explain earlier discrepancies. The combined pharmacokinetic differences may increase the vulnerability of women to the effects of ethanol.
BACKGROUND: The enhanced vulnerability of women to develop alcohol-related diseases may be due to their higher blood alcohol levels after drinking, but the mechanism for this effect is debated. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy volunteers of both genders drank 0.3 g of ethanol/kg of body weight (as 5%, 10%, or 40% solutions) postprandially. Blood alcohol concentrations were monitored by breath analysis and compared with those after intravenous infusion of the same dose. First-pass metabolism was quantified (using Michaelis-Menten kinetics) as the route-dependent difference in the amount of ethanol reaching the systemic blood. Gastric emptying was assessed by nuclear scanning after intake of 300 microCurie of technetium-labeled diethylene triamine pentacetic acid in 10% ethanol. The activities of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes were assessed in 58 gastric biopsies, using preferred substrates for gamma-ADH (acetaldehyde) and for final sigma-ADH (m-nitrobenzaldehyde) and a specific reaction of chi-ADH (glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase). RESULTS:Women had less first-pass metabolism than men when given 10% or 40%, but not 5%, alcohol. This was associated with lower gastric chi-ADH activity; its low affinity for ethanol could explain the greater gender difference in first-pass metabolism with high rather than with low concentrations of imbibed alcohol. Alcohol gastric emptying was 42% slower and hepatic oxidation was 10% higher in women. A 7.3% smaller volume of alcohol distribution contributed to the higher ethanol levels in women, but it did not account for the route-dependent effects. CONCLUSIONS: The gender difference in alcohol levels is due mainly to a smaller gastric metabolism in females (because of a significantly lesser activity of chi-ADH), rather than to differences in gastric emptying or in hepatic oxidation of ethanol. The concentration-dependency of these effects may explain earlier discrepancies. The combined pharmacokinetic differences may increase the vulnerability of women to the effects of ethanol.
Authors: A S Gallo; M A Berducci; S Nijhawan; D F Nino; R C Broderick; C R Harnsberger; S Lazar; C Echon; H F Fuchs; F Alvarez; B J Sandler; G Jacobsen; S Horgan Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; Brinda K Rana; Lee Ann Mendoza; Dennis Clarke; Mari Kawamura Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Tara E Karns-Wright; John D Roache; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Yuanyuan Liang; Jillian Mullen; Donald M Dougherty Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 2.826